Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thats how I wanted it but I think we have a different metal brace to other ppl. Everything screws in the middle and locks into the little slots (red circles) but the climate control mounts further to the bottom than center (top two red circles).

Also the climate control is slightly wider at the front and only seems to fit where the brace is shallower (blue line)

If you find a way it fits without cutting and drilling I'd like to know how

post-78650-0-24142600-1315913055_thumb.jpg

I wonder if the climate control unit and/or the bracket are different between the V (auto) and the S (manual). The S has the factory three gauges up the top and then the climate control in the middle (sometimes it's the other way round)..

post-34764-0-53089400-1316871909_thumb.jpg

As you can see in the photo...I wonder if our manual friends on here can tell us is there a difference in the climate control unit or the bracket because like you, I don't want to do any cutting or trimming of he bracket

My pic is of an auto not sure if it gives enough of an idea where things sit.

I've already outlined the main issues I can see. When I tried to put the climate control else where it just didnt want to fit.pinch.gif

  • 1 month later...

Thats how I wanted it but I think we have a different metal brace to other ppl. Everything screws in the middle and locks into the little slots (red circles) but the climate control mounts further to the bottom than center (top two red circles).

Also the climate control is slightly wider at the front and only seems to fit where the brace is shallower (blue line)

If you find a way it fits without cutting and drilling I'd like to know how

post-78650-0-24142600-1315913055_thumb.jpg

Does anyone know if you the brackets pictured below, would be suitable for the gauges/climate/stereo order?

daf680ss-img600x450-1312181089nrcy0y21859.jpg

They look the same as my rs4s ones.

Awesome, thanks for that mate. I've purchased them through Import Monster so they should be here in a few weeks... fingers crossed that they will do the job. :thumbsup:

Awesome, thanks for that mate. I've purchased them through Import Monster so they should be here in a few weeks... fingers crossed that they will do the job. :thumbsup:

whereabouts in Import Monster did you find it??

whereabouts in Import Monster did you find it??

I think I searched for ステージア(Stagea in Japanese) under the Car Audio category. I did a lot of trawling, things seems to be listed all over the place :P

Edited by Marshstag

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...