Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lets say peak power was at 5k and you wanted to generate this peak power so had full throttle, what would stop the motor revving to say 6k? That is what I am trying to understand.

Engine produces

150kw @ 3000rpm

180kw @ 4000rpm

200kw @ 5000rpm.

170kw @ 6000rpm

You need to access that 200kw so the throttle is open 100%. It cant go over 5000rpm because the engine makes less power above 5000rpm.

You can vary rpm using the throttle to achieve what you want or you can vary load on the engine using the variable hydraulics. It would be a combination of both

Edited by Bond

The generator would be the smart part of the system as it regulates its magnetic feild inconjunction with the demand from the APP sensor and the engine's delivered torque.

This would be alot more effienent than a hydraulic system by about 20-30 percent hence why Caterpillars new 795F is electrodrive.

You cannot base everything on the fact that CAT use this system in large dump trucks where weight and cost are of little issue. The systems i have been talking about are also made by CAT...does that mean they are superior....NO. The 20-30% efficiency may come from regenerative braking where energy is stored while travelling down the pit and then used later on

Edited by Bond

WIth the motor and generator combination, could you not just use an AC -> AC motor? There are no inverters, regulators, nothing needed, you could literally just wire them directly together removing a point of inefficiency.

If you just wire them together with nothing smart in the middle, then you have no way to modulate the speed of the vehicle separately to the engine speed. Your ECVT is then not a CVT, just an expensive coupling.

If you just wire them together with nothing smart in the middle, then you have no way to modulate the speed of the vehicle separately to the engine speed. Your ECVT is then not a CVT, just an expensive coupling.

Couldn't you just use the engines throttle to modulate speed. If you have more throttle you get more revs and power, hence the motor delivers more power. Less throttle means it delivers less throttle. You are right, this wouldn't be a true CVT then, but it would have of the benefits of a CVT, being able to hold a motor at peak power without a gearbox changing gears and dropping you out of the powerband.

It would be better with a control system, but a control system requires a huge ass VSD, inverters, AC -> DC etc which is another stage of inefficiency's.

Couldn't you just use the engines throttle to modulate speed. If you have more throttle you get more revs and power, hence the motor delivers more power. Less throttle means it delivers less throttle. You are right, this wouldn't be a true CVT then, but it would have of the benefits of a CVT, being able to hold a motor at peak power without a gearbox changing gears and dropping you out of the powerband.

It would be better with a control system, but a control system requires a huge ass VSD, inverters, AC -> DC etc which is another stage of inefficiency's.

Um, no, you couldn't. Think about it a bit more. The generator turns at exactly the same speed as the engine. If it is an AC generator then it will spit out a varying voltage and frequency, which if you hook it straight up to an AC motor will make the AC motor do pretty much the same as the generator is doing. Same speed. No gearing, nothing useful. If the generator is DC, then the gen will output a voltage that depends on the engine speed, and the DC motor that is hooked up to it will just spin at the same speed as the generator. As I said, an expensive coupling.

You could have different speeds between generator and motor by having different windings on them - ie you could make one 4 pole and one 6 pole and get a different synchronous speed on AC stuff. And if you were crazy you could put multiple windings into one or both of them and switch between them but this would only give you a number of different gears, not CVT.

You very much need to be able to chop the power that comes out of the generator into little pieces and smirsh it around and then feed it into the motor to give you the result you're looking for.

Of course, with an AC motor the speed is going to be proportional to the hz, the hz of course is exactly the same rpm the engine is doing hence it would be like having a single gear which is as you said just an expensive coupling.

So you would either need a VSD or convert it to DC and control it this way.

You cannot base everything on the fact that CAT use this system in large dump trucks where weight and cost are of little issue. The systems i have been talking about are also made by CAT...does that mean they are superior....NO. The 20-30% efficiency may come from regenerative braking where energy is stored while travelling down the pit and then used later on

I was mearly comparing electro drive to a hydraulic based system. Considering most variable displacement axial piston pumps are around 50-60% efficient.

And there is no regenerative braking on the 795F - just a really big resistor and cooler fan!

I don't think the powerband in a turbo petrol is small enough to warrant this setup. How about just hooking up an 8 speed Auto.

This really is the ultimate way to go, with 8 gears you could quite effectively utilise a power band that is even only 1k wide.

All hypothetical.

Assuming the system will be used as normal road going car.

Most power is required for acceleration, once at a constant speed your power requirement will be much less and once you start braking, you can use this energy to regenerate.

So I was thinking you can have a diesel engine running at its most effiecient RPM/powerband constantly, this then drives the electric motors and charges some sort of super capacitor/s.

The diesel engine idles down to a slower speed when the car is stationary or when generation is not required.

When the car accelerates the capacitors discharge into the electric motors to assist the power generated by the diesel engine for the burst of power required for acceleration. Once at constant speed the diesel engine's electricity output should be enough to sustain the an constant speed and slight acceleration.

When the car slows down, it will use regenerative braking to charge the capacitors, and the diesel engine can idle down earlier if needed.

This really is the ultimate way to go, with 8 gears you could quite effectively utilise a power band that is even only 1k wide.

Lexus IS-F :P

i don't wanna talk to a scientist, those mother f**kers lying and getting me pissed.

LOL

A-Z of shit music, triple J absolutely destroy them, f**king hilarious

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...