Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Email nistune themselves and find out who in your area can do a nistune for you.

A stock tune and the module etc wouldn't set you back much more than $600, a wideband alone is what $400?

I really wouldn't waste your time, if you continue to mod your car an SAFC won't be good enough, might as well do it once do it properly, will get a much better tune with a nistune or powerfc etc.

That will be the plan if im unhappy with the results of using the safc 2.

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I just noticed your in Wellington. Me too.

Anyway, i was going to avoid posting in your thread basically because as much as people are telling you to steer clear, you have your mind set.

But just as one more bit of local advice, i had an SAFC2 in my R33 too. I had mine Dyno tuned, AND road tuned. Basically, as someone stated earlier, all your doing is trimming fuel and the ecu will trim ignition to compensate. Its a lose lose situation, as in the end you might make more power, but you'll end up running dangerously lean.

With my car, on most occasions the car would get one decent run in, and then it was almost like the ECU would freak out and pull timing everywhere untill the next re-start.

Andre had mine on the dyno after i had mine Dyno tuned elsewhere, and it was running "Lean for an N/A" as he stated it.

Not to mention when the weather warmed up again, it started to detonate like f**king crazy in the higher RPM area. So i ripped it out and threw it away.

If you go down the path, post up your results anyway. Ill post mine here for you to show how little it did for the danger it caused.

SkylineDyno217001.jpg

So it def helped a little bit, but id say 80% of that was due to timing change.

Good luck.

Edited by gotRICE?

I just noticed your in Wellington. Me too.

Anyway, i was going to avoid posting in your thread basically because as much as people are telling you to steer clear, you have your mind set.

But just as one more bit of local advice, i had an SAFC2 in my R33 too. I had mine Dyno tuned, AND road tuned. Basically, as someone stated earlier, all your doing is trimming fuel and the ecu will trim ignition to compensate. Its a lose lose situation, as in the end you might make more power, but you'll end up running dangerously lean.

With my car, on most occasions the car would get one decent run in, and then it was almost like the ECU would freak out and pull timing everywhere untill the next re-start.

Andre had mine on the dyno after i had mine Dyno tuned elsewhere, and it was running "Lean for an N/A" as he stated it.

Not to mention when the weather warmed up again, it started to detonate like f**king crazy in the higher RPM area. So i ripped it out and threw it away.

If you go down the path, post up your results anyway. Ill post mine here for you to show how little it did for the danger it caused.

SkylineDyno217001.jpg

So it def helped a little bit, but id say 80% of that was due to timing change.

Good luck.

Heya thanks for that. Are you Turbine on the Skylines Down Under New Zealand Thread? Ive been following your build up aye.

Yeah well its just that because I have seen some of the guys on here run safc 2's with upgraded turbo's I thought I would give it a shot. If it drives fine and I am happy with it then thats 3k I dont have to fork out for a link g4 and dyno tune or power fc and tune. Would be nice if someone in wellington tuned nistune but aparently not so If I am not happy with the safc 2 I will use my spare 300zx ecu and get a nistune daughter board and tune that. And if I need a 300zx afm I also got one of them lying around so will use that if I need to.

Yep thats me :)

A G4 can be had for under $2000 :)

And, i have a special someone that is pretty excitable when it comes to tuning new skylines. So if you do go down that path im sure he would be more than happy to have a play with it.

Iv had the G4 in mine for the best part of a year now, and since the GT30 went on, it hasnt seen a dyno.

How far along is your SAFC so far? i didnt notice the dates.

Cancel that.

Must be the way he has the dyno set.

My car Stock Turbo vs Lithium GT30: (Better add that its 3rd gear for the stocker, and 4th for the GT30.. speed cut hehe.)

R33sStockvsGT3076R.jpg

Edited by gotRICE?

Thats what hub dynos seem to look like over here \:S

Really? I imagine they would have less 'smoothing' due to being a direct attachment but doesn't that just point to the tune being rough? Those are some pretty damn big spikes!

Yep thats me :)

A G4 can be had for under $2000 :)

And, i have a special someone that is pretty excitable when it comes to tuning new skylines. So if you do go down that path im sure he would be more than happy to have a play with it.

Iv had the G4 in mine for the best part of a year now, and since the GT30 went on, it hasnt seen a dyno.

How far along is your SAFC so far? i didnt notice the dates.

Wow thats cool. Ill have to check out your thread on SDU NZ. Last time I looked you were still running stock turbo. Thats cool as to know then ay ill keep that in mind.

How much did you pay for a G4? Im still torn as to if the safc 2 doesnt work out what to get lol. I would love to get my hands on a power fc but they are rare and expensive when I see them. The main thing thats so attractive about the G4 is that its local and everyone knows how to tune them by the sounds of it lol. I really want to give it a shot myself ay.

Safc and RSM are in the car all ready to go. Currently Im waiting for my mate to finish the Catch Can and Exhaust as I was still running a stock dump pipe. Also tryna find someone that can paint and play with fibre glass as I got some GTR Style End Caps that need to go on and a little drift wing to. Then its wof cert and reg lol.

I believe the G4 i bought was in the area of $1700 + $100 for an IAT Sensor.

They are really great ECU's. For the price you have to pay for an PFC and a hand controller, IMO your far better off with a Link. And the local support is fantastic.

I believe the G4 i bought was in the area of $1700 + $100 for an IAT Sensor.

They are really great ECU's. For the price you have to pay for an PFC and a hand controller, IMO your far better off with a Link. And the local support is fantastic.

Wow thats alright ay, Last time I asked someone for a qoute I think they told me like almost 2000 for just the ecu. Have you ever tried to tune one or play around with one?

Every weekend :P

Awww ay thats cool. Would like to definatly learn! Whats the learning curve like? Did you teach yourself by reading of the net? Or do you have mates that know alot about tuning? Id definatly be keen to learn and get to know the sdu nz crew ay.

Link is definitely a better option than a PowerFC still a lot of money though, email nistune and see if they know of any tuners in your area.

Yeah im definatly gonna email nistune and see what they say. I definatly would like to give the whole tuning thing a shot myself. Nistune might be a good start if the safc2 doesnt work out.

Thanks for that! I would love to hear from some of these guys and see what they thought of overall power and how their cars drove with the safc2 and turbo upgrades etc.

Thanks for that! I would love to hear from some of these guys and see what they thought of overall power and how their cars drove with the safc2 and turbo upgrades etc.

From what I've read it sounds terrible, high risk of blowing your motor up from detonation if you push any amount of power out of it, if you are conservative it almost isn't worth even using an SAFC. If you don't own a wideband and knock ears ($2000+) then don't even think about attempting to tune this yourself.

If you don't own that equipment then spend the $2500 on an ECU that a local tuner is competent with and can tune safely. If they don't own knock ears or a wideband don't ever go back.

Tuning a turbocharged engine is not something you skimp on, you can very easily blow a motor up if you don't have experience and the proper equipment to make sure you aren't running lean or detonating.

Edited by Rolls

I believe the G4 i bought was in the area of $1700 + $100 for an IAT Sensor.

They are really great ECU's. For the price you have to pay for an PFC and a hand controller, IMO your far better off with a Link. And the local support is fantastic.

Just been looking around at the g4 plug ins today and they all seem to be $1895 for just the ecu. Where did you manage to score one from for the price you got it for?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...