Jump to content
SAU Community

Fs: 1990 Hr32 Skyline Gts-T In Adelaide


Recommended Posts

HR32 Skyline GTS-T

$11,000 O.N.O

Performance Liquid Gas Injection System

Modest 140 kW at the wheels

Runs superbly, very economical

400 Kms per tank of gas, 9-10 tanks of gas per tank of petrol

Religiously washed and looked after

Recently serviced (fluids changed and tuned)

Selling due to change of interests/lifestyle and purchase of 4x4 for improved practicality

Engine Mods:

RB20DET Stock Engine and Turbo (only done 100,000 Kms)

Custom Liquid Gas Injection Conversion

Custom Gas Computer

Brand New Ignition Module

Heavy Duty Twin Plate Clutch

Thermo Fan

K&N Air Filter

JJR Delta Fin Front Mount Intercooler (600x300x70) with custom chrome piping

3.5” Cat-Back N1 Exhaust System with 5” rear cannon with new exhaust mounts

GT-R Fuel Pump

Exterior Mods:

Starcorp Impuls 18” Rims

Brand New Zetum 225/40/R18 Fronts

Brand New Zetum 235/40/R18 Rears

Brand New Bomex Front Bar (not shown in pictures)

GT-R Style Side Skirts

Vertex Rear Bar

Drift Style Custom Bonnet

Brand New Silicone Wiper Blades

Interior Mods:

Apex’i Boost Gauge

Pivot Speed Meter

Viper Alarm

Drift Brand Adjustable Racing Seat (ADR Approved)

Custom Trimmed Interior

Issota White Steering Wheel and Boss Kit

Razo Gear Knob

7” Touch Screen Head Unit (CD/MP3/DVD/USB/iPod Ready)

Sony 6x9” 3-Way Speakers

Sound Stream 6.5” Splits

1100watt Amplifier with 12” Fusion Sub

Bad Points:

Minor ding to underside rear bar (barely noticeable)

Plugged holes in boot from previously fitted spoiler

cp4720562325777745377.jpg

cp5158714409068742252.jpg

cp4668315753367097747.jpg

cp5681795745043116901.jpg

cp5309833150882517129.jpg

cp5524996520418307702.jpg

cp4786743054826822208.jpg

cp5455627397084226503.jpg

cp5312085693996143784.jpg

cp5006840610802064628.jpg

cp5107096764626768834.jpg

cp5281794421061549015.jpg

cp5656770864899216518.jpg

cp4732678437034178432.jpg

Edited by Camo87
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have your numbers back to front. 350mm from wheel centre to guard lip would be scrapinly low and the suspension arms would be at spastic angles and it would have the road manners of a meth affected giraffe. You can down to ~450mm (from larger stock starting values about 50ish mm higher than that) before you start to create to many problems.
    • I think last I checked it was 35cm from fender to wheel center. I heard u can go up to 45-48cm before handling his impacted. But I need to check again. I know I was about 1.2 cm off being close to max recommended. 
    • You'd need to weld on an external gate to achieve that number though. I can't remember seeing anyone make 500hp at the wheels with the stock manifold / internally gated turbo.
    • Suspension Component Question Looking for some feedback based on people's experiences! I know this has been loosely covered in other threads but I can't find any direct answers/experience. I'm up for some bush/rod replacements and was interested in a hybrid approach between hardened rubber and pillowball kit. Why not choose one or the other? Well, this is for my daily driver, which I track once or twice a year. I like a stiff car and a sporty feel but I don't want to compromise the chassis too much with 100% pillowball gadgetry.  I know from experience and a tonne of reading that not all components affect ride quality in the same way - eg. in my case, coilover top mounts should be hardened rubber as pillowball transfers way too many undesirable qualities and doesn't have much more upside than a good hardened rubber. But, pillowball tension rods translate to much better turn-in/steering response and make the car significantly sharper, without negatively impacting ride quality in a significant way.  I'm not TOO bothered by NVH (to a degree). So, with context out of the way, does anyone have any experience with a hybrid approach as mentioned above? I'm going to replace all components over time so am seeking guidance on: - front tension rods - upper camber arms - rear lower control arm - rear traction rod - rear upper camber arm - rear toe adjuster rod  Secondly, is there any reason why this is a bad idea? Or any other info/wisdom that I might not be considering. Cheers 🫶
    • That's good to hear I'll stick with the stock I hear they are good for 500hp and I'm only shooting for 350-400 once I can get this thing sorted and get to actually building it. 
×
×
  • Create New...