Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dot is an abbreviation (can't remember it) but it's basically a national standard. Dot 3 is a lower boiling point than dot 4 and 4 is lower than 5. 5 is expensive and needs to be replaced frequently.

Like the other guy said, dot 3 is the minimum you should put in. Go for dot 4 and you'll be good for 2 years at least.

DOT 3, DOT4 and DOT 5.1 are all compatible, with the higher number having a higher boiling point.

DOT5 is a silicon based brake fluid and does NOT absorb water, if you don't change it VERY frequently the water pools in your caliper and when it boils your brakes will fade very easily. The other fluids absorb water and don't reduce their boiling point as much so they are suitable for road cars with normal service schedules. DOT5 is for race cars only where the brakes are constantly serviced.

  • 9 months later...

I used regular castrol DOT4 for my clutch. Are you sure it doesn't say "not to be mixed with dot3" or something like that?

Other than boiling point different, DOT3 is chemically the same as DOT4 except DOT4 contains borate esters. DOT4 might theoretically eat away at the rubber seals or the rubber brake lines if it's a "DOT3 only" system.

Knowing Nissan they were most likely looking ahead, and made the system compatible with DOT4, it's just the DOT 4 standard hadn't been formally introduced yet (no idea what year it was introduced).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...