Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK.. I've had my car off the road since Easter.

I did the 100,000 service myself (water pump, timing belt etc.). I figured while I was doing that it would be a good time to install a forward facing plenum, Q45 TB, adj. cam gears, ext. manifold, new intercooler + piping.

Long story short it's been nothing but problems. I think everything is back together correctly.. The thing is when I crank it, there doesn't seem to be any spark. I get code 55 - all ok via consult

What I've tries thus far:

Checked all plugs etc connected

new battery

new earth lead to neg. terminal

new lead from positive lead to fuse box in boot

spinning CAS with ignition on (injectors click)

reversing the fuel lines in case I got it backwards

test light jammed in a coil (no sparks when cranking)

Any advice would be appreciated.

other stuff on the car that worked fine before I messed with it:

RB20ECU with nistune daughter board

T04

splitfire coilpacks

Z32 AFM

Bosch fuel pump

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381199-r33-s2-wont-start-no-spark/
Share on other sites

Have you checked the earth points in the engine bay, just below the fuse box.

I had a problem for 2 years where if i used anything electrical in my car it would shoot to 2000rpm and stay there until i turned the applience off E.G lights

Its simply was arcing on the paint work so i sanded back a little bit and its been fine. Just start with the basics.

Have you checked the earth points in the engine bay, just below the fuse box.

I just connected the test light to the positive side of the engine bay fuse box and touched the head, block, manifolds and the light glows bright. So the earth must be good.

Is it possible to disconnect the coil loom and stick a multimeter on the pins of the plug? If anyone can tell me the proper method (multimeter setting, where to put each lead etc. What values I should get with the ignition on).

All coilpacks should have a common power wire. Normally the same colour on all 6 plugs. Check these have power.

U will need an LED test light to check there is a pulse coming from the ecu on one of the other pins in the coilpack plug

Hi i have just done a engine rebuild with a forward facing manifolf greddy style and i had the black earth wires earthed near the vct contoller and i had the manifold painted and a thermal gasket and my engine would not fire i had to remove the paint and for extra insurance i ran an extra earth strap to manifold then car has ran sweet since hope this is of some help

I give up. I'm towing it to BoostWorx

I'm pretty sure I had good earth to the plenum. I'll add a strap anyway. If I recall correctly the only place that wasn't earthed was the fuel rail. I figured that was by design due to the black plastic bushes?

Bostworx got it going: in a nut shell - Fuel lines backwards...

I tried that, so it may have been a combination of things like old battery/fuel pump etc. I just didn't go back and try the fuel hoses after the other "fixes" because I crossed it off the list.

Thanks to those who tried to help.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...