Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys

Just wondering which line the supposed restictor is for the stock boost system?

I remember reading someone soldered something up and re-drilled it to a larger size so it bleeds off more air

I had a look and was suspecting it to be in the brass F shaped connector but it wasn't, and i couldn't feel any lumps and bumps in the other lines :(

if i can bleed some more air off i'll be able to keep 5psi low boost and move the 7 psi high boost towards 10 :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381250-where-is-the-vac-line-restictor-vvv/
Share on other sites

Can confirm that restrictors are in tubes and marked with a yellow band or dot on the pipe , that`s on a series 1 Stagea , is also used to mark pipes on a 32 GTR - so should be the same for a series 2 Stagea , but , the boost controller and pipes are not your only restriction ! , your actuator is only capable of 10psi ( again series 1 information and so presuming same as series 2 Stagea ) so an adjustable actuator is needed . you may need a fuel cut defender as well , as when the boost goes up so dose fuel consumption and the standard fuel pressure regulator cuts of via a signal to the ECU as it dose not recognise the signal and higher flow of fuel - this results in the engine cutting/stalling and detonation of middle piston rings ... !! .. I HAVE JUST DONE THIS SO KNOW THE PIT FALLS !! Now need a new engine !!!

To be honest the best route is a one hit assault on your wallet and Garage = ECU upgrade , aftermarket boost controller , adjustable actuator .... Done !! .. Sort of !

The Mines ECU fitted to another Stagea was the Dogs bollox , made a huge power difference and ran as smooth and economical as standard . You can spend a fortune adapting and upgrading and actually make it worse !!

ECU upgrade , aftermarket boost controller , adjustable actuator ... have a think about it >_<

:cheers:

Can confirm that restrictors are in tubes and marked with a yellow band or dot on the pipe , that`s on a series 1 Stagea , is also used to mark pipes on a 32 GTR - so should be the same for a series 2 Stagea , but , the boost controller and pipes are not your only restriction ! , your actuator is only capable of 10psi ( again series 1 information and so presuming same as series 2 Stagea ) so an adjustable actuator is needed . you may need a fuel cut defender as well , as when the boost goes up so dose fuel consumption and the standard fuel pressure regulator cuts of via a signal to the ECU as it dose not recognise the signal and higher flow of fuel - this results in the engine cutting/stalling and detonation of middle piston rings ... !! .. I HAVE JUST DONE THIS SO KNOW THE PIT FALLS !! Now need a new engine !!!

To be honest the best route is a one hit assault on your wallet and Garage = ECU upgrade , aftermarket boost controller , adjustable actuator .... Done !! .. Sort of !

The Mines ECU fitted to another Stagea was the Dogs bollox , made a huge power difference and ran as smooth and economical as standard . You can spend a fortune adapting and upgrading and actually make it worse !!

ECU upgrade , aftermarket boost controller , adjustable actuator ... have a think about it >_<

:cheers:

thanks for you help mate

just to point you in the right direction with the fuel cut stuff

more boost = more air flow, if you max out the AFM or what the ecu sees as acceptable it will put you into the R&R section of the map (rich and retard)

if you go high enough you will hit fuel cut, this is still done by the ecu and it just turns the injectors off

the fuel regulator just keeps the pressure difference between the fuel rail and plenum the same (add 7psi of boost to the plenum, the regulator adds 7psi to the fuel rail)

mines ecu's are also tuned for jap fuels (about 100 ron normally), they are also uber rich but you get the goodness of speed limiter removed and usually good for much more boost

they are also normally done to individual cars so its pretty hit and miss, you obviously got one for a car with similar mods to yours

thanks for the info, don't take my rant the wrong way, i just hate seeing wrong infos on the interwebs

Cheers, Tom

When you find the restrictor it is not just a case of drilling it out (you may not have to drill it out at all). I think (its a few years ago now) the restrictor is in the supply not the bleed line. The cheapest reliable way to get your dual boost is with a Jaycar ebc. The best way is to get a Link or Vipec ecu!

yeah i played around a bit yesterday

drilled them out, filled them back up with solder and drilled them smaller

all in all, not much of a change (drilling them out means that the bleed solenoid can't bleed off enough air, lol)

with smaller holes i was able to get about 8psi

maybe i will install my jaycar ebc after all

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...