Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

rego'd yet?

Aiming for compliance within a month.

Did those RCA work out?? Did you buddy ever get his set?? Car looks good so far can not wait to see it finished.

Hey Derux! Installing them very soon. Am sure they will work great. Thanks. Did you not hear back from ghostrider?

you're going to attempt to make power with undersized carbys. thats my guess :)

Wrong :)

C'mon Jason give me some credit. Here's a few hints. Their 41mm, have no chokes and came out of one of these little terrors.

Img_2759A_WEB.jpg

they certainly look the part, i would be interested to see if they can flow enough on idle jet/needle to get enough resolution for a decent idle on something twice the capacity they are designed for.

My Honda 1300 Coupe 9 ran quad Keihins; they went and sounded great. Obviously, they were on a 1300cc engine though, so no idea how they'll work out on an FJ.

You'll score a million points for interesting if you do an NA FJ in my book.

Won't lie, being different is a major factor.

Any pics of the Honda?

Amongst the many fitted to 1.6L 4age's.. Have seen them on 2 SR20's(+ an SR20 kit for sale on YAJ) and one FJ20. As well as two L series running sextuplets.

Mine are the largest model. From what I've seen they cope well with 50-60hp per carb.

Understand completely. Don't care about beating every v6 commodore at the lights with this car. Anything further than a high flow on this would be kinda silly anyway with the tyres and camber it has.

I think if weight is brought down to -1100kg and 220-240hp with these carbs it will still be fun, sound great and serve it's main purpose, being unique.

Turbo engine will stay until a lighter chassis is acquired and readied for conversion. (really want a 1600).

Edited by D-limo

I have a sinking feeling Honda pics are on my old digi camera that I dropped then hurled into the bin without pulling the memory card... like a spaz. I may have some photos I can scan though - I'll see what I can dig up. There's a decent pic of the quad set up on the wikipedia page though for the meanwhile.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Honda1300Coupe9Engine.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...