Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If you read that link from Eagle they say they do not use an off-the-shelf ARP fastener. I'd be going off the rod manufacturers specifications.

There are plenty of good machinists up here Dave, but it's simply not a job that just anyone with a line borer can do. The length of the block prohibits most people from doing an accurate job and even though it may look accurate, most of the time they are not. I have never encountered a block that needed line boring but I'm sure they exist.

I've seen some really nasty examples done by some well known engine shops. Girdle bolted down flat, tunnel was round but not straight on one side. I only picked it up because I use a straight edge every time. It was straight on the main length but not the horizontal, and only on one side. You couldn't see it by eye but the girdle would have walked around on the block and caused a myriad of other issues.

0.001 is a lot of tunnel distortion. Are you sure you don't mean 0.0001? We commonly see 0.0001-0.0003 (in extreme cases). Yes an open hole jig was used to determine stretch. We spent a considerable amount of time working out what worked and what didn't and what was acceptable and not.

Like I have said in his build thread, if it was tunnel bored, he will need to make sure the machine shop he used, used arp specs or there will be a hole heap of clearence issues.

That would be true if the bottom end wasn't already together

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...