Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

good commitment, results and thread :D and excellent work from Yavuz as usual.

For those wondering, a dead stock rb26 has the same CAS issue, although in my case we just lived with it (no choice in a production race car).

cas_error2.jpg

Anyone with datalogit can pull the same data from any RB I bet.

  • Like 1

Not sure. I would have to ask him. I'm sure he would be able to pull up some sort of log for that. I do know we went from 1.7ish bar to 2.0 bar and it made an extra 12 kw. That was obviously on the RS/Rubbish setup.

Well done Paul on trying a different route to what everyone else usually takes. You (and Unigroup :cool: ) have done very well to get the flex fuel and crank trigger working in sync to produce an awesome result. I must say I've been in (and driven) many GTR's but your car scared me a little being a passenger at Winton. I'm not a good passenger at best of times but the way this thing accelerated out of the corners was something else. It kinda of reminded me of Tangomatt's car, it's on early and the progressive and copious amounts of power just made this car feel bullshit fast.

As I said to you at the Nats, if only I had this sort of power (and delivery) in my car back in the day....

Look forward to jumping in for another ride at next year's Nats....

Joe yeah spotted that one, maaaaay need a wash haha :D

That turbo is fkn massive. Should reel off a damn good figure and now that trigger means you can use silly RPM if needed!

dont worry mate she'll scrub up all right :thumbsup: , hoping for 400rwkw but may have to wind a bit of boost into it to get there

any of those cars in the shop yours stevo?

Be interesting to know how much more this balancer will allow the engine to rev safely? Yavuz didnt happen to mention anything about it Paul?

very interesting to know that it makes the car idle a better

Edited by GTR_JOEY

dont worry mate she'll scrub up all right :thumbsup: , hoping for 400rwkw but may have to wind a bit of boost into it to get there

any of those cars in the shop yours stevo?

Be interesting to know how much more this balancer will allow the engine to rev safely? Yavuz didnt happen to mention anything about it Paul?

very interesting to know that it makes the car idle a better

I am not sure if it was the trigger or the ECU to allow it to idle solid. Although I do remember when we first put the ECU in and Yavuz whacked in a few numbers, the first thing I did notice was the idle being so much more steady. At that time the car was still running off the factory CAS.

No neither of our cars were out there today. You MAY see mine if you're out there next week.

dont worry mate she'll scrub up all right :thumbsup: , hoping for 400rwkw but may have to wind a bit of boost into it to get there

any of those cars in the shop yours stevo?

Be interesting to know how much more this balancer will allow the engine to rev safely? Yavuz didnt happen to mention anything about it Paul?

very interesting to know that it makes the car idle a better

400kw is a lot - that number is thrown around a lot on here but thats a fkn fast car!

Nah mine isnt there. I'd like to know who owns that white 32, thats looking pretty nice and a really neat interior effort.

When I asked Yavuz ages ago he said something along the lines of more than ever needed from an RB haha but it's worth asking the question again I guess

I noticed my idle went from great (Autronic) to average/lumpy (PowerFC DJetro). Same happened on Pauls one, he had PFC (AFM's) with such a lumpy idle and now it's much better (Link G4). We both have Tomei 270 Procams, so there's no way to shut them up completely, mine is a bit more subtle than his which would be capacity related (cant be anything else, theyre so close to each other except for the capacity)

Paul - Would love to have a drive! Although I may not give you back the keys...

Steve - I have been exposed!!!! :banana:

Just wait till his is done completely, next Nats you can try his then mine - then go home and buy another R ;)

Well I'll be back from WA next Wednesday so I'll be popping in to see how the progress on the car is goin so I may see yours in there if it's there towards the end of the week...

I tell u what though that blue 32 is one sweet custom job, yavuz was saying that it was also gettin one of these balancer kits as well...

Yea 400kw is alot of power lol I can't really imagine what its goin to feel like... Quickest I've had is 290

I don't think I'd mind that rough idle though makes it sound tough I reckon..

I've just got the tomei type b poncams (260 degree from memory) with 800cc so I don't think mine will be that lumpy

I saw those 800's on there today. The way Yavuz tunes, i would bet money on them not being big enough. Time will tell!

That blue one already has the trigger kit on it, although it only has 12 teeth and not 34.

Joe you'll see now the kit is finished, heaps of GTR's will be getting them there. I know of one Melbourne workshop getting to play with one soon too - so it's not just Sydney siders who are lucky with this bit of gear.

From 290 to 400? Yeah, hold-the-fu(k-on, thats a big jump :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...