Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

Picked up my 300GT today. Really nice car and amazing value for money.

I think I read somewhere that the tank is 80L. Can anyone confirm this?

I was low on fuel, light was on and my interpretation of the trip computer was that I only had about 50km left in the tank. So when I filled up it took 58 litres. If it is an 80 litre tank then my gauge is faulty, as is the trip computer. 80 seems like a lot to me......

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/392100-300gt-fuel-tank-capacity/
Share on other sites

I have wondered the same. the most fuel I have put in my 350GT sedan is about 62L and that was with the fuel light on for the last 20km and the gauge showing just over the empty mark.

Pretty sure it's a 80 litre tank as well. Had at approx. 800km out of a tank on a trip to VIC a while back.

Might have to chuck a jerry can in the boot and go for it.

I was on empty for ages yesterday, and the trip computer said I had less than 50kms left. When I filled up it took 61 litres. Something is not right here. It cannot be an 80l tank if the trip computer says there are only 50kms left and yet it still has 19 litres int he tank....

^ yeah.. if they do have an 80L tank, the fuel light comes on with 1/4 of a tank left..

Someone in another thread mentioned there is a write up on cleaning the fuel level sender which may fix this.. I'm not too worried about mine, as long as I don't ever run out of fuel..

Will say the 250GT isn't as thirsty as I thought, proved alot of people wrong with it's economy. Man you can feel the extra weight with a full tank hahaha.

It is an 80L tank according to Nissan.

  • 1 month later...

Hi Everyone,

Picked up my 300GT today. Really nice car and amazing value for money.

I think I read somewhere that the tank is 80L. Can anyone confirm this?

I was low on fuel, light was on and my interpretation of the trip computer was that I only had about 50km left in the tank. So when I filled up it took 58 litres. If it is an 80 litre tank then my gauge is faulty, as is the trip computer. 80 seems like a lot to me......

That's a bit interesting. A few weeks ago, the fuel light was on. So I put $50 worth of Petrol in my car, at that time $50 got almost 34Lt of Unleaded. Then then next day, I would add some engine cleaning fluid in it. therefore I topped up the tank, but it took only $23 worth of Petrol. Then the tank was full. It also spilled out of the tank a little bit.

You guys are saying that it is 80Lt thank. How on earth is that possible. By the way with that much petrol (approximately 55Lt) I did almost 600km (it would be much more if it wasn't driving to work-busy freeway, damn trafic light here and there...etc.)

So wehre is the rest of my fuel tank.

:)

Well I put 61.570Lt @ $1.659/L and it came to $102.14 and that was from just under a quater of a tank till it was full to the brim and I couldn't fit anymore in.

Can't remember the range till empty figure but it lasted who solid weeks

i barely get 450km from a full tank... usually about $100 of premium. thats all city suburbs, no highway and no peak hour. and the fuel meter says i average 12L/100km

i definitely dont trust the fuel range display. when full, it says i have a range of 650km.... but have never made it last even 500.

i had the light come on at E on the guage, the meter said i had 77km to go..... 2 km later and it said i had 23km to go.... then it said 0km...

Edited by Deep Dish V35

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...