Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So im basically making a decision on rims, and i need you guys for some advice,

What kind of rims should i put on my r33 ?

its gunmetal grey ,

$$ isnt a factor but being wise with $ would be good.

Thanks in advance :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/392757-what-kind-of-rims-do-you-guys-think/
Share on other sites

my n15 pulsar has great condition stock pulsar alloy wheels. tyres are new, and quite cheap to replace, as they are only quite small. the wheels also come with a very unimpressive offset, so police dont bother you.

You clearly state that money is NOT an issue, so i can let you have them for say, $50 each.

Lemme know your thoughts.

Love adam

Look around I just bought weds kranze jap wheels , 18x10 for $500 off a mate with Michelin tires on em ..... Be patient you'll find good dealsLook at work CAI wheels....so niceDrift teksTe-37 Weds sa-60m are nice too

why would you spend 1g on 33 gtr wheels when you can get 34 gtr wheels for 1300?

Because R34 GTR rims have GTR written in the center caps and are 18" as well are they not, personally I didn't like the look either, I think the 33 rims look the best.

Each to their own.

  • 2 weeks later...

appreciate the help, lol yeah i wouldnt wanna be riding with wheels that says GTR in the middle , becuase we aint GTR! Lol,

it would be as bad a holden drivers putting f#@#@#@#@*#@n chev badges on thier VT's. ooof.

but yeah i will take all your opinions and have a good think about it.

Atm im copping a boost look or something, Car runs good then stalls, but its not as bad as it used to be as i have found the main issue, just need to find the minor one, what ever is causing it must be boost related yeah ?

my n15 pulsar has great condition stock pulsar alloy wheels. tyres are new, and quite cheap to replace, as they are only quite small. the wheels also come with a very unimpressive offset, so police dont bother you.

You clearly state that money is NOT an issue, so i can let you have them for say, $50 each.

Lemme know your thoughts.

Love adam

HAHA yeah i would absolutely love to but my mate is offering me one in a lifetime holden ceptors -.-

not. hahaha.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...