Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the glass will help out a lot. but no you won't get the same quality as a newer body.

image size.

iso.

colour depth.

focusing capabilities.

dynamic range.

and more will all suffer.

It will definately look stacks better than a kit lens on the same body though.

p.s. Thanks ;)

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

After the Chocolate Cruise yesterday I stopped by Waragamba to see what the overflow looks like in person. Snapped a few shots but really didn't take the time I should have to set up some decent stuff. Was incredible how many people came out to see it too.

Last ones are a couple of shots from the car cruise.

P1150878.JPG

great post Eric, love all those shots but especially the one i quoted. cheers for the new wallpaper!

Sorry richie I like the original better. My personal taste however..

Following four lit with one 430exii.

43.jpg

Rest on my blog if anyone is keen..

Shes soooo hawt! single?

oh wait...:blush:

sterling work as usual Jay and Matt, i dont know how you guys keep doing it, inspiring me to get a proper DLSR camera one day.....one day.

this is one i took the other night with my tiny pocket Sony.

430694_10150580340896537_511696536_9282564_1908958028_n.jpg

again, need opinion on which is better out of two virtually identical shots..sorry

421906_10150580340666537_151538291_n.jpg

sterling work as usual Jay and Matt, i dont know how you guys keep doing it, inspiring me to get a proper DLSR camera one day.....one day.

cheers Pat (and everyone else giving me props) but I havent owned a DSLR since 2010. this G12 is fairly close to a DSLR tho with its manual controls.

i have a job interview today for a web programming position (just a contract, but its a start) so hopefully i can start a new fund for a new camera.

as a bonus this position could involve some photography work, even if its just taking pics of products for the website.

guess your G12 at least has a decent sized lense and you seem to know how to get the best out of it using different settings etc, i have never changed anything for a shot other than turn the flash on or off, a DSLR with full manual settings is going to be a real challenge..will be so tempted to just leave it in auto like i do with the little instasnap thing i have.

Someone last night recommended i get a Canon D series for best quality and i would be able to use it for videography as well, problem is like you Jay...funds..maybe i should wait till the tax return comes in and get the best one i can afford.!

cheers Pat (and everyone else giving me props) but I havent owned a DSLR since 2010. this G12 is fairly close to a DSLR tho with its manual controls.

i have a job interview today for a web programming position (just a contract, but its a start) so hopefully i can start a new fund for a new camera.

as a bonus this position could involve some photography work, even if its just taking pics of products for the website.

Tax deductable ftw...

Now is SHE single?

lol

great shots, oh and what do u mean clear? i do wipe the lense now and then even though its like 1cm sq.

derp

Haha, she is my wife. Been playing around with the 80s look so taking a few random photos to test it on. When I said "crystal clear", I ment- those photos from the point and shoot is amazing in quality.

Been a while since my last post...

Tops man, love that photo.

Another 80s attempt... They are all using different methods to get the results... trying to find one I am completely happy with... I look at them and think they look good, then seconds later absolutely hate it and vice versa.

3-11.jpg

First time uploading as only got camera yesterday and wanting to get into some automotive photography (as a hobby!) two quick shots (please don't laugh as its my first play with a digital slr!)

091-1.jpg

015.jpg

More to come once I get the hang of things!

Been a while since my last post...

stunning work, you might even be able to make my 33 look good with a silhouette shot like that, keep em coming

Haha, she is my wife. Been playing around with the 80s look so taking a few random photos to test it on. When I said "crystal clear", I meant- those photos from the point and shoot is amazing in quality.

Another 80s attempt... They are all using different methods to get the results... trying to find one I am completely happy with... I look at them and think they look good, then seconds later absolutely hate it and vice versa.

all the shots look great, is this all post production or something you do as you take it? She looks like a keeper btw. (guess thats why u wifed her)

First time uploading as only got camera yesterday and wanting to get into some automotive photography (as a hobby!) two quick shots (please don't laugh as its my first play with a digital slr!)

More to come once I get the hang of things!

which model did you go with? solid state? no-ones laughing at you in here mate, you go to the wasteland for that. I like the second shot more, slightly artier than the standard engine bay shot.

First time uploading as only got camera yesterday and wanting to get into some automotive photography (as a hobby!) two quick shots (please don't laugh as its my first play with a digital slr!)

More to come once I get the hang of things!

Great start mate. Welcome to the manual world.

all the shots look great, is this all post production or something you do as you take it? She looks like a keeper btw. (guess thats why u wifed her)

The last photo is as is, but the other two of my wife had a new action I'm trying to create for a cross between modern and 80s look.

Richie - Personally not a fan of making an image looks like from the 80s. My style is more modern vibrant pics. So maybe thats why I cant see it working. I do like the PP you did to your wife.

Just in the past 2 or 3 days I have been doing more black and whites. Well just mucking around in PP.

Nice shot there fongy. Are those fake lights put in PP on top of the image? Eitherway nice lighting on the car.

Peter - the only way to learn is to keep taking photos :) Keep at it mate.

patty - hahah im sure you know the answer to your question lol.

IMG_9181_resize.jpg

IMG_2637_resize.jpg

IMG_8229_resize.jpg

IMG_5318_resize.jpg

IMG_5358_resize.jpg

Richie - Personally not a fan of making an image looks like from the 80s. My style is more modern vibrant pics. So maybe thats why I cant see it working. I do like the PP you did to your wife.

Great photos as usual man!

When I look at some of those 80's looking photos, I can just sit here and look at them for hours. The vibrant photos, even though they are amazing, I find myself flicking through them quicker. I do keep both copies though (standard and 80s) so it is available for whomever to select from. But I do find myself just sitting there staring on end - I'm sure you know what I mean here.

On a different note, I've been asked to shoot some weddings and photos here and there, and starting to gain interest from people I don't know. I enjoy photography more than IT to be honest, so I thought, why not make a website to help transition? http://www.richardgrainger.com.au/ - I've been building this website from the ground up, completely from scratch. Still a few things here and there needed to be done, but I thought I'd share it with you guys before anyone else :) Only closest family/friends have seen this website so far.

To me its black and white photos. I can stare at it all day long. But everyone has a different style and if clients like the 80s style then you should cater to them and market them. There are thousands of wedding photographers but if you can cater yourself to a particular market/target then you will be set. But keep at it and dont let our comments keep you away from making a style.

For me I like to see vibrant modern pictures so my opinion might not be suited. Its good your giving the client two choices. But in the end its double processing. Once you become a full-time wedding photographer you will realise how available your time is.

Anyways enough rambling.. Your website is coming along nicely :) Maybe the menus at the top could be changed a little?

Messy hair is messy:

IMG_bnw_resize.jpg

421906_10150580340666537_151538291_n.jpg

i think this is the better of the two personally. although, the longer leading line (station platform) in the other one works well. shot in landscape format would have worked well to emphasize the bend in the track.

went out for a bit tonight...

428160_185016301613118_175609209220494_306350_876159650_n.jpg

gah, they really need to do some weeding :P spewing my camera has a 15 second exposure limit. probably should have sat around stacking 20 or so pics to get star trails, but would have got bored.

417205_185023394945742_175609209220494_306370_2063962905_n.jpg

next time im taking my gumboots, lol. not 100% on this one, got a mix of different light in it so the color is a bit wak down the bottom.

those are great shots guys, something about the gorgeous girl in your shot Siddr...Im not a betting man but if i was i would put all my money on her having ample boobs. Yeah i know, real classy.

anyway thanks for the advice Jay, not sure the landscape format would have made a difference with my tiny camera but i WILL try it out next time im at a similar stop to see if it makes any impression on the final result.

how much spelunking do you do in those caves? gotta take balls that, no fear of getting caught by a flash flood or giant rat ala' fallout3?

anyway thanks for the advice Jay, not sure the landscape format would have made a difference with my tiny camera but i WILL try it out next time im at a similar stop to see if it makes any impression on the final result.

how much spelunking do you do in those caves? gotta take balls that, no fear of getting caught by a flash flood or giant rat ala' fallout3?

your right, it might not work, but experimentation is the key. sometimes its the things you think wont work that actually do.

the 'cave' here is just a big tunnel under a road. so no risk of getting caught out really.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...