Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How's it going guys my rb25 blew last summer the timeing belt broke mashed the head up and broke a pistion so I finaly have a new head and the money to rebuild the engine. I'm from the US but the fourms here suck as far as rb knowledge goes. So I'm shooting for 500rwhp in a s13 this is a list of parts I plan on useing to get me there if you all could let me know what's needed and what's not or a better way to get the best bang for my buck let me know thanks in advanced. Arp head , main, and rod studs / acl main and rod bearings / isis intake manifold / either cp or wisco pistons / and either eagle or manly rods / z32 Maf with a q45 throttle body / stock exhaust manifold with tial 44mm external waste gate / holset Hx35 / as for head gasket I'm looking at the cosworth or the apexi and I'm running a apexi power fc/ for fuel injectors 1000cc not sure if that's over kill or not please let me know / and I'm running a z32 twin turbo fuel pump

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/394072-rb25det-rebuild-help/
Share on other sites

You're going to be spending a fair bit of money so you'll want to get it right first time. I would suggest it worth your while to have a good read of this thread:

http://www.skylinesa...s-engine-build/

My only quick suggestion is that for 375rwkw you will want something better than the stock exhaust manifold e.g. a 6 boost or a Sinco customs one:

http://www.sincocust...20Fabrication/2

http://www.6boost.com/

Also have a read of the thread at the top of this page: dyno results for RB25 upgrades

http://www.skylinesa...l-dyno-results/

Guys in NZ are getting good results with Holset turbos but I don't know the capabilities of the one you are proposing to use - what is its mamimum output? And is the fuel pump brand new? I would want a new pump such as a Denso at least.I would prefer a more modern ecu such as a Link but if you already have the PFC it will be fine.

Recommend reading the dyno thread and seeing what similar people have used to get their results. Remember your 500hp is generally less than ours, also not sure if you guys measure at wheels or translate to at the flywheel, but take that into account.

To (kiwi) the max output of the holset is 60lb/ per min the trucks they use them on run 32psi all day so I figured it would work for what I'm wanting and I do plan on going with a 6boost I'm waiting for a group buy to come up or one for sale on our fourms here in the us.

To (rolls) most of us dyno our cars at the wheels but I do know our HP rating seems to be higher than most other places I just figured we tac on the extra HP for the amercian ego trip lol.

A truck engine isn't a skyline engine. Totally different rev range, flow rate, pressure ratio blah blah.

Read the dyno thread, see what worked for other people and duplicate it. Garret gt3076 is good for 300kw ish which imo for a 2.5L would be the max you'd want before the lag starts to get serious. You can do that on a stock motor, or a built motor with cast pistons if it is tuned correctly.

If you want to build a motor just buy a full rb30 from rips, do it once do it properly, 3L and it will probably cost almost what you'd pay to rebuild yours a few times after the first time it grenades because the builder wasn't experienced.

Ok (rolls) I under stand that but please look into the holset for the price of it you can't beat it I've researched it many times that's why I went with it!!!!! I'm sure I will change the turbo when I can afford one but then again I don't want my car to be a dyno queen

What research did you actually do?

The holset is possibly the laggiest turbo for the power you could use...

There are NO decent results around anywhere that I've seen. I remember doing some digging mid last year as someone else from the US was wanting to use one, all the results were just ridiculously laggy and they were on 3ltrs (2JZ).

What research did you actually do?

The holset is possibly the laggiest turbo for the power you could use...

There are NO decent results around anywhere that I've seen. I remember doing some digging mid last year as someone else from the US was wanting to use one, all the results were just ridiculously laggy and they were on 3ltrs (2JZ).

Seriously? I've seen and know people who have got awesome results with HX35s... from WAY back, if I could talk to the guy I was in 2006 I would tell myself that my initial preference of going an HX35 on an aftermarket manifold instead of the the internal gated stock mount GT3076R for slightly cheaper would have probably been the better way to go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...