Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So please outline exactly what is different now that it is a DE+t...

The fact that you a swapping and changing parts between s1 and s2 when they are known to be different is quite perplexing..

rb25det s1 injectors

rb25det s1 ecu

What airflow meter?

Also get yourself a consult cable and a copy of Datascan or ECUTalk, check for error codes and see what is happening when the idle is hunting.. is it trying to chase the idle with the IACV? or is it doing it via timing?

Have you checked your base and cam timing?

P.S. building hybrid engines of this sort you really need to have a good idea of what the ECU and all sensors are seeing/doing otherwise you will just be chasing your tail when issues like this arise (such as you are now).

Hey Bro have you tried cleaning your aac valve system, i did this to my rb25 on the weekend and car idles were it should, use to idle round the 2k mark,

im not sure if you have a "pulsing idle" as goes from 1500 to 2000 and back and forth, also check that your Throttle Positioning System electrical plugs are pluged in properly and not dirty?

just some hints that you could possibly try?

links below if you want to read more about AAC

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/110431-diy-aac-valve-cleaning-idle-reset/

Cheers

It's not AAC. It's IAC. ferchrissake.

Nissan Actually calls it an AAC dude.

Auxiliary Air Control valve. IACV is the same thing just worded differently. Idle Air Control Valve.

But Nissan call it an AAC valve.

Then there is the cold start valve which isn't controlled by the ECU, along with the FICD or Fast Idle Control Device.

there is actually 2 idle devices

aac - aux air control

and

iacv - idle air control valve

in r34's they integrated them but the aac i believe is the one under the manifold that brings the revs up when you cold start, iacv is the one bolted to the back of the intake manifold

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...