Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, so ur in a drift..... Why is it that when your rear wheels are spinning faster they have less traction (ie; increase throttle = decrease traction)? What is the scientific explanation?

I guess that having ur wheels spinning faster decreases a quantity of the co-efficient of friction and hence reduces traction but what quantity? Maybe contact area of tyre decreases...

This is for a physics assignment by the way.

Thanks in advance for any help.

Col

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/
Share on other sites

Well if you know how a tyre works.

And if you know why they lose traction..

They lose traction because the car is sideways for one. The car has enough power to start them spinning could be another.

A tyre will have trouble gaining traction while its spinning, even moreso if its going sideways.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-801542
Share on other sites

the directional force of the wheel is going the opposite way to the force thats being placed on the car by inertia of the car losing traction (going sideways)

therefore the car will keep traction lost until the directional force meets up with the inertia of the car (going in a straight line)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-801611
Share on other sites

tyres only have so much grip ... once you apply a certain amount of friction then they loose their grip and slide...

if they grip x amount, once you apply x amount in a rotating manner then they will loose traction

if you apply x amount of force to them laterally they will loose traction

the reason cars can loos traction easier when going around a corner is because the tyres are getting force put on them in a rotating AND lateral way....

its pretty simple, im not physicist

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-801614
Share on other sites

I didn't write the Q very clearly b4, sorry...

I understand how and why they break traction. I need to know why a wheel spinning at 120kph(wheel rotation speed, not car speed) has less lateral traction than a wheel spinning at 90kph. eg; When you initiate a drift... if you apply 100% throttle the tail will hang more than if you apply 75% throttle.

I cant get away with saying "The faster it spins the less traction" (this is what i have already). I need to know why a faster spinning wheel has less lateral traction....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-801924
Share on other sites

While I can't think of a simple answer to your question I think you also need to consider the "system" that is a drifting car. Remember there are two wheels spinning at different speeds relative to the road surface. So it may be that partly the effect is due to a "caterpillar track" between the two wheels creating a moment (heh :P)

http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~vawter/PhysicsNet/T...ces/Normal.html

http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~vawter/PhysicsNet/T...ionalForce.html

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-802005
Share on other sites

The angle of the tail hanging out is increased because you are accelerating the car forwards and turning it around the corner. The spinning back wheels have less friction then the front wheel ( i will try and explain that in a sec ) The back therefore is thrown out from the centre of rotation of the car , ie the back tries to continue straight ahead while the front turns and the car goes sideways.

To materials in contact with each other have a coeficient of friction.

When a force is applied to those to materials that is trying to move there surfaces along each other, ie accelrate, turn, brake. No slip will happen until you reach the coefficient of friction for those materials.

Once you reach it, slip will happen which immediately lowers the coefficent of friction and therfore causes more slip and so on. Providing more force to the situation by applying more throttle only increases the slip and lowers the coefficient futher.

The only way to regain the original static friction is to take away the force that is causing it, but you have to take more away fisrtly because you lowered that threshold immediately as you broke traction originally. After it is reestablished more force can be applied up to the point of breaking traction again.

In practise this is why accelrating from standstill in the wet without spinning is quicker than just sitting there spinning on the rev limiter.

Put a piece of wet paper on a surface like glass. Push it until it moves and you will be able to continue pushing it with less force than you needed to get it going in the first place.

Proffesor DRIFTO

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-802181
Share on other sites

tail hangs out more due to centrifugal force of car going round corner.......faster spinning tyre has less traction due to increased heating of the rubber.....hotter the rubber, the slipperier(sp) it is..... this is the way i see it , anyways

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-803680
Share on other sites

Was going to have a crack at answering this one... but sat and thought for 10 mins and decided that it would take way to much typing and then I still wasn't sure if I had the right answer... hence I appoligise for not writing anything.

How ever I would imagine it to be a combination of many forces, and what each thing is designed to do... for eg. the rear wheels (forget HICAS just for a minute) are designed to push the car forward. Speed into coner would also be a factor.

I would say come out to the Drift day at Oran Park this weekend and do some research! Except that you live in Adelaide!

Dan.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-805707
Share on other sites

spoke to my phys teacher. he thinks that the reciprocal to the downward (well on an angle) force exerted by the tyre to the ground causes an elevation and hence reduces contact area of tyre so lateral friction is reduced. (as surface area is a dirctly proportional quantity in the coefficient of friction)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-810936
Share on other sites

hmm, sounds like you need a new physics teacher :P

interesting that no-one has put up a 100% beleivable explaination yet, since the amount of throttle makes a heap of difference there must be a good reason :confused: Drifto may have got it but I didn't understand :(

Is it simply that a tyre spinning faster has less total grip, and therefore less grip to provide for lateral movement?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-811070
Share on other sites

I think really some testing a datalogging is required.

It would be interesting to see the difference it all really makes.

Let's not forget the handbrake factor where the wheel is spinning at 0rpm and the car goes more sideways... Or does it :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-811662
Share on other sites

nah what my phys teach told me was correct. It has to be a decrease in contact area of tyre as perpendicular forces do not directly affect each other i.e. decrease in lateral traction is not directly related to wheel spin speed. The only change as a result of increased spin speed that could affect the lateral traction is a change in contact area of tyre. If ne1 knows this is wrong please post, cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-812551
Share on other sites

Like I said, there are many contributing factors, suspension geometry and set up play a huge part, I know that you can have a tyre wear evenly. This might be due in part to differing contact areas through out a drift perhaps?

If I understand correctly the second diagram of the tyre and contact points would lead to mean that eventually the tyre would leave the ground? This is not possible I'm sure.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-813479
Share on other sites

From a Mechanical Engineers pov, and a concept well understood in racing, a tyre has a maximum grip in any direction, referred to as a friction circle, or more correctly as a friction ellipse. The ellipse is because lateral traction is not equal to longitudinal traction in all tyres.

Drifting is essentially braking in reverse, and Jim Clarke was one of the first racers to develop a high degree of understanding in racing. When you apply a cornering force with no acceleration or deceleration you can achieve the total grip available in that direction, but when you apply torque through acceleration or deceleration you now have to resolve the forces in the two directions using a simple Euclidian geometry calculation in vector mathematics.

When the forces exceed the traction available through (lets say static as the rolling tyre has certain slip characteristics that overly complicate the discussion) friction then you get wheelspin and a higher sideways slip angle as front tyre drag becomes a more relevant force. Now the other interesting phenomenon is the difference between static and dynamic friction. Once traction is lost and wheel speed increases relative to the ground, the coefficient of friction decreases. Tyre engineers and chemists put a lot of effort into ensuring there is a fairly linear decrease in the dynamic coefficient of friction as the relative speeds increase to generate predictability. the last thing you want is fro the tyre to grip suddenly or to completely lose traction without some indication.

Now you have another phenomenon that is related to the contact patch, the pressure in the tyre, and the angle of contact at the contact patch which in itself is essentially flat. As the tyre accelerates, the contact patch grows longer because the tyre "grows" (watch a drag rail do a burnout) due to the centrifugal forces of the tread band. The angle of contact approaches zero but never quite does as if it were to, there would be zero contact patch and zero friction. Think of an integration summation formula. The contact patch also grows narrower as the centre of the tyre bulges further. It doesn't actually "lift" itself due to the angle of contact. Temperature plays a part as previously mentioned as well in the differing cf.

As with any problem such as this, locate your points of contact, draw free body diagrams in the plane of contact at each wheel/contact point and look at the magnitude and direction of forces closely and the solution will reveal itself very rapidly, but the key is the reduced contact patch and the variation of dynamic friction.

How do I know this? My undergrad thesis was on the drag losses in a moving wheel and the tyre companies where not very forthcoming with specification detail so I had to develop it myself from first principles and verify through testing. This also meant that I had to understand and read through the many other phenomenon that occur within tyre design and development. I convinced the Head of the school of engineering (a physics professor) and the head of the school of mathematics so there must be something right. I continue to study, with a master of engineering, and now toward employment in race engineering after being exposed to the possibilities by one of the forum members.

Get a new physics teacher if he did those drawings or found them satisfactory. Remember there are four contact points in the car diagram not one and the tyre theory is fundamentally incorrect. He did get the decrease in contact patch right, but for the wrong reason. Also the coefficient of friction is not a static figure with tyres after loss of traction.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-813850
Share on other sites

Get a new physics teacher if he did those drawings or found them satisfactory.

I drew them. lol. I only have to go into a little detail and my phys teacher didn't have a prob with them. It's a 1000 word essay so i can't really get everything in. u know how yr 12 is. If ur teach says it's OK don't change it. I'm just ignoring a whole stack of stuff and trying to put what i think has the most importance.

I'd post the essay up but i don't want it to get torn appart. I'd rather just think it's good.

cheers 4 that last post though skylinegeoff, that was gold.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39455-drift-physwics/#findComment-813894
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would just put EBC back on the "I would not use their stuff" pile and move on.
    • Can I suggest you try EBC directly again and link them to as many competitor catalogues as you can to show their listing is incorrect, eg https://dba.com.au/product/front-4000-series-hd-brake-rotor-dba42304/ If you have access to an R33 GTST VIN and your VIN, you could also use a Nissan Parts lookup like Amayama to show them the part number is different between 33 GTST and 34 GTT which may get their attention
    • So i got reply from EBC and they just this site where you can clearly see those 296mm fronts on R34 GTT. I send them photos and "quotes" that 296mm are not for 34 GTT and they are too small. But it will be very hard to return them cuz nobody here knows 100% and they just copy those EBC catalogue :-D https://ebcbrakesdirect.com/automotive/nissan/skyline-r34
    • Hi, is the HKS  Tower Bar still available ? negotiable ? 🤔
    • From there, it is really just test and assemble. Plug the adapter cables from the unit into the back of the screen, then the other side to the car harness. Don't forget all the other plugs too! Run the cables behind the unit and screw it back into place (4 screws) and you should now have 3 cables to run from the top screen to the android unit. I ran them along the DS of the other AV units in the gap between their backets and the console, and used some corrugated tubing on the sharp edges of the bracket so the wires were safe. Plug the centre console and lower screen in temporarily and turn the car to ACC, the AV should fire up as normal. Hold the back button for 3 sec and Android should appear on the top screen. You need to set the input to Aux for audio (more on that later). I put the unit under the AC duct in the centre console, with the wifi antenna on top of the AC duct near the shifter, the bluetooth antenna on the AC duct under the centre console The GPS unit on top of the DS to AC duct; they all seem to work OK there are are out of the way. Neat cable routing is a pain. For the drive recorder I mounted it near the rear view mirror and run the cable in the headlining, across the a pillar and then down the inside of the a pillar seal to the DS lower dash. From there it goes across and to one USB input for the unit. The second USB input is attached to the ECUtec OBD dongle and the 3rd goes to the USB bulkhead connected I added in the centre console. This is how the centre console looks "tidied" up Note I didn't install the provided speaker, didn't use the 2.5mm IPod in line or the piggyback loom for the Ipod or change any DIP switches; they seem to only be required if you need to use the Ipod input rather than the AUX input. That's it, install done, I'll follow up with a separate post on how the unit works, but in summary it retains all factory functions and inputs (so I still use my phone to the car for calls), reverse still works like factory etc.
×
×
  • Create New...