Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wanna go back to the drags but only got chinese tyres which also are old n hard.

But need some new tyres, better quality an newer, was considering some KU36's.

first time i went to willowbank ran some falken 452's an managed a best of 1.59 60ft. would ku36's give better traction? Problem i can see is i dont know how to warm the tyres, so would cold ku36's be any grippier then falken 452's?

as i noticed last time as it got latter in the nite n cooler my 60ft times were slowly getting worse, tho mph was goin up so the times stayed the same (11.7)

also is there an easy way to warm ur tyres in an 33gtr?

any experience or advice/tips would be greatly appreaciated =)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/397038-tyres-for-dragstreet/
Share on other sites

If it's a relatively stock GTR - 1.60 for street tyres is pretty reasonable. You'd struggle to get much better on street tyres, maybe 1.5. Tyres aren't 'as important' as you don't really have the power to turn them (if its stock-ish).

No easy way on a R33 GTR to warm tyres, just drop the pressures down to around 20-22psi, avoid the wet ground for burnout start and away you go.

Has 420hp atw (think thats bit over 300kwatw) about 40hp more then when i was there the first time, seen a couple gtr's one with bout 320hpatw an one with 460hp that couldnt get traction first i think had pretty cheap rubber but the 460hp one had fairly mid range 265 rubber (cant remember brand) an couldnt get traction till 2nd gear an started to brake traction again an only managed a 12.4 maybe 12.3

just know every 1/10of a second off the 60ft is worth a fair bit more at the end... tho my original goal was to crack 200km/h at the end of the strip, 60ft might not count much towards that (top speed so far was 189km/h @ 380hp atw)

tho a quick 1/4 mile slip quietens the supercharged commordore boys kw bragging! :rofl:

yer i always went around the water, but there was a definate change in 60ft times as the air got cooler, an the tryes cooled down, first runs tyres were still a lil warm from driving there, latter runs the car had been sitting still for a fair while.

so do u think ku36's or a simalar tyre would get beta grip when cold then a normal street tyre?, plz recommend a different tyre if u think they're beta, but the tyres need to be drivin on the street, on a daily basis so dont want "drag" only tyres. i guess i could put it into limp mode.. but would be a lil annoying tho would be worth a go...

  • 9 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...