Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I've been lurking around SAU for a long time now. I first joined to get info on RB engines as I have a 26 going into my 240z. Recently I brought a c210 coupe though and here is it's story.

Picked it up from Adelaide in 2010 and drove it home with a mate. Here's the trip.

post-35025-0-19319900-1335340744_thumb.jpg

A little hard to read but it says 2015km, average speed 104km/h, max speed 157km/h, total time 20h33m. My GPS doesn't keep track when the ignition is off though, actual total was 25 hours as we stopped at a motel for 4 hours. Not a bad effort from Adelaide to Ipswich QLD.

Here it is when she arrived.

post-35025-0-89639400-1335358057_thumb.jpg

It had some exhaust leaks from broken studs and a few holes so I fitted new studs and put on a 240z exhaust manifold and front half of the piping. The 240z one is a 6-2-1 system with long secondaries, nothing special but definitely better than the original log.

post-35025-0-54913400-1335350089_thumb.jpg

The carby was stuffed so I put on these twins from my 240z. They are the original early round top 3 bolt style for anyone knowledgeable on zeds. This was also part of the reason I put the zed exhaust on too as the original Skyline one has the inlet and exhaust manifolds joined in the middle. You can't really use one without the other. I had them rebuilt and got some sock filters because they look cool.

post-35025-0-92355600-1335350465_thumb.jpg

post-35025-0-28553700-1335357754_thumb.jpg

The plan was to leave it as is and use it as a second car until after the zed is finished and do mild street build then. But as fate would have it this happened and changed all that. A guy pulled out onto a roundabout in front of me.

post-35025-0-33765500-1335357930_thumb.jpg

Now as I have to repair it and paint it I have bought some of it's plans forward. It will receive a respray and a colour change. I have a set of ZG bolt on flares that are not wide enough for the zed that will be used on the Skyline. Of course with flares some new wheels will be needed.

I have a set of 17x9.5 -19 Rota rb-r's that the zed may donate to the Skyline as a little get well soon present.

post-35025-0-74353200-1335350574_thumb.jpg

This is not my zed btw.

post-35025-0-09751800-1335353770_thumb.jpg

They look like 45 or 50 series though, here are some 235 40 series.

post-35025-0-83447600-1335354257_thumb.jpg

and some 255 40 series, I think I would go 235/40/17 if I went 17's.

post-35025-0-30079100-1335354292_thumb.jpg

I feel they are too pretty for the zed but I'm not sure about the size on the Skyline. The 9.5 part fits fine (with flares), but 17's will need 40 series tires to look right I think, and even then I don't want it looking too modern. If I decide against these then I'll be looking at 15x9's. These look good for the price.

post-35025-0-97549500-1335350586_thumb.jpg

Rota Shakotan's in 15x9 -10.

post-35025-0-55086200-1335354769_thumb.jpg

Post your vote for what wheel and in what size you would like to see me go with. Budget for wheels is around $1000.

Other than that if funds allow then I would like to throw on some s13 coilovers, disc brake rear and later model brakes on the front to suit the s13 knuckles. If I go with 17's I have a full set of z32 300zx brakes here. If I go 15's I'll go r31 rear and s15 2 pots up front. I have a 2 way Tomei lsd and 4.875 diff for it too.

Here is some of my inspiration.

post-35025-0-83248700-1335352979_thumb.jpg

post-35025-0-20773400-1335351894_thumb.jpg

post-35025-0-76054800-1335351879_thumb.jpg

Edited by rb26zed
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398613-my-c210-coupe-build-thread/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...