Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I did not know the S300P was available? Did he elaborate on the wheel/housing sizing on this?

He said it could be made by custom order... Rear housing was a 0.80 T4 divided, wheels I'm not 100% sure but I believe they are similar to the EFR8374 as he mentioned once it was a prototype for that turbo

Now the choice is to get a surge ported from cover or not and where to buy it from...

Surge cover for sure. They are a winner on those turbos. I think the CEA design wheel works well with it.

I will PM you a quote I received for a friend!

  • 6 months later...

This one will be a rear wheel drive GTT with an RB26 in it.

I'm looking for a single turbo/manifold combo that will net around 370kws.

Motor will be kept pretty simple with a built bottom end, drop in poncams, very little headwork, running on E85.

Looking for 20psi by say 4000rpm.

If I were building exactly the same thing, going by the things I've seen out and about these days - I'd go for a single entry FP GT3076R HTA with .82a/r hot side on a 6boost manifold.

I'd say your 370kw on E85, and 20psi by 4000rpm should be pretty achieveable with that combination - potentially with change.

I was trolling around and found this thread - until seeing this I couldn't specifically remember when I had recommended the HTA3076 as I normally have that kind of convo in PM and I'd never found it.... this would be why I didn't remember it, you had asked about a setup for an RB26 :D

Fast forward a year, the project turned into an R33 GTS25t with an RB25 in it but the same power/spool target and you took the plunge on the HTA3076 - looking forward to final results, but do you know if it hit the 20psi by 4000rpm rpm target yet?

Haha i just read this thread again this morning after searching around in circles :P I think the target was met or close too it.

I was pretty confident that the RB26 would do it, and suspect the RB25 should be good for it too - though certainly will be interesting to know how it all comes out. It'll probably never happen to mine now (it was semi-on the cards when this thread started - hence the quick response), so would be good to enjoy vicariously!

I was pretty confident that the RB26 would do it, and suspect the RB25 should be good for it too - though certainly will be interesting to know how it all comes out. It'll probably never happen to mine now (it was semi-on the cards when this thread started - hence the quick response), so would be good to enjoy vicariously!

I think the final tune was to be last week or this week so it should be close too result time! Im keen to see the final numbers too :yes:

Final tune will be late next week now as car is at the painters. Tuner was too busy last week so I took the opportunity to send it to paint in the meantime....

Patience guys, results soon... :yes:

Final tune will be late next week now as car is at the painters. Tuner was too busy last week so I took the opportunity to send it to paint in the meantime....

Patience guys, results soon... :yes:

Late next week is good news to me, I had assumed it was going to be a while before you got back to it :D Would be awesome to see what the overall finished product comes out like when its done :)

Final tune will be late next week now as car is at the painters. Tuner was too busy last week so I took the opportunity to send it to paint in the meantime....

Patience guys, results soon... :yes:

Are you kidding me? :P I am going to fall off my seat with anticipation heheheehe

Really keen to hear, good luck mate :thumbsup:

  • 4 weeks later...

Final tune will be late next week now as car is at the painters. Tuner was too busy last week so I took the opportunity to send it to paint in the meantime....

Patience guys, results soon... :yes:

I've managed to last around 3 weeks without annoying you :D How are things going with this, did it make it to the tuner - or are there still plans to get it back on the dyno sometime soon?

It's on the dyno now actually. Been on a few times this week. Having issues with the ecu losing/not storing tune. Thinks it's fckd. Similar issue to when run in tune was being done.

Damn :( Was really hoping it would go well for you as i was super keen to see the result ;)

Hope the ECU issue gets sorted out and you get the results you are after mate!

Haltech Platinum Pro.

ECU is off to Haltech tomorrow to get checked out.

One day............

Who you speaking too at Haltech?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...