Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey

Looking @ an ARX

Price seems OK, however I thought Id do some research B4 I commit to anything

The yard seems quite keen to unload it.

http://www.tradingpost.com.au/Automotiv ... 9202054638

If anyone knows of any history of this car Id appreciate the info

Cheers

Posted this elsewhere aswell

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400073-anyone-know-this-m35-arx/
Share on other sites

I think its just a paper filter Duncan, It does have factory cruise though.

Funny having cruise & not audio controls (or both) on the ARX. Does that automatically make it the laser type where you can't set it above ~100km/hr, regularly fail, often disconnect with oncoming vehicles & other quirky features?

Might be right there Scott, it doesnt look quite the right colour for K&N.

Leon - yep, that'd be radar cruise. You can see the radar in the grill - the solid part around the Nissan logo is the give away. It's possible that its been converted to a non-oem cruise but I wouldnt bank on it.

Leon - yep, that'd be radar cruise. You can see the radar in the grill - the solid part around the Nissan logo is the give away. It's possible that its been converted to a non-oem cruise but I wouldnt bank on it.

Lol, I can't see squat in the grill - even zoomed in. I'll take your word for it. That grill doesn't look too bad actually, for an OEM one.

mmmmmm.... that takes me back.. looks just like my car when I got it 4 1/2 years ago. (except the cruise control)

The car has the optional safety pack which includes 6 air bags (2 in front, in the sides of fron seat and full side curtain) and rear centre lap sash seat belt.

Looks like a nice example

Thanx for all the posts

If we can unload our current car Ill probably go take it for a drive & see how it goes

Only thing I could see that annoys me is the front seat leather is worn

I know this happens but seems quite bad for a car that has 90K on the clock

The rest of the car seems ablout right for those Kms

Couple of little marks on it, but the cars going to get used for carting kids so not really fussed

Cheers

It probably has 3 times that on the clock. Most do. The odo's get wound back all the time unfortunately.

If you want genuine k's you are best importing it yourself through iron chef.

Lol as I found out doing a language conversion for a certain dealership recently

"yeh we wind them back all the time I actually have someone that comes in and does them for me" lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...