Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

agreed. Eventually.

You'll also notice your car might stall 'for no reason' at times depending on your driving style.

This is due to blocking the BOV.

The BOV is probably one of the only stock things that serves a half decent purpose (read: then I/C is crap as well as the stock turbo and the ECU to boot) I'd leave un-blocked.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40021-the-flutter-sound/#findComment-819692
Share on other sites

your gonna notice if yur getting back fire that you are most likely chewing petrol, and yes it will affect you turbo, there are a lot of threads covering this, look them up.. theres a lot of mixed reviews, bootom line is ur std bov was put there for a reason. i know of a guy doing this to his pulsar et turbo, then his engine blew.

its your risk at the end of the day

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40021-the-flutter-sound/#findComment-820113
Share on other sites

Vl turbos dont come out with a bov, although i agree that they are there for a reason, i have had mine disconnected for along time now and no noticeable damage. Still goes alrite, um...at the end of the day if u want the noise without spending money on a ssq bov etc then it shte cheaper way out initially, maybe not in the long run.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40021-the-flutter-sound/#findComment-820340
Share on other sites

i had two ets. both were pretty worked. when you installed the aftermarket (bosch) bov we had to block the stock bov. which we did by unscrewing the bov off and blocking it with a large type of screw that fitted in place. trust me man. maybe the previous owner took your stocky off???

its good to see a fellow n12 owner though, i had heaps of fun in those little things, my fiorst car when i was 15

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40021-the-flutter-sound/#findComment-820555
Share on other sites

Possibly... but the pipe from the turbo to the inlet looked factory. It was the start of my car hobby so wasn't as switched on about the ins and outs of turbo cars as i am now. But i never saw anything that looked like a bov. Mine was a 1984 model... perhaps they put them on the later models.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40021-the-flutter-sound/#findComment-820619
Share on other sites

so his exa didn't have a bov either? interesting that nissan would put a bov on the ET but not the exa...

as for the flutter sound, i would be a little warey about trying to get it. It slows your turbo down so it has to build boost again after the gear change. Especially bad with a bigger turbo so perhaps not so much of an issue with the stock one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40021-the-flutter-sound/#findComment-820748
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...