Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You're thinking into this too much Ruxis.

SAU can be held liable when they organise a cruise because they are the organisation in charge of the forum.

The fact is, a user on a car forum won't be held liable for organising an unofficial cruise simply because there is no proof that it was you exactly who posted the car meet.

Whilst it might have come from your IP address, doesnt mean you were the one using your account at that time.

I'd think that you can only be held liable if you admit to being at fault for organising the meet at the scene of the accident. That is considered evidence.

For once benji you have made sense, hmm alright if I post an event (:P) I'll do it under a blanket so no one can see me or prove it was me. Some mother f**ker broke in posted it and left!!

Haha mat that rule doesn't apply to me, I'm not as... Special as you :P

I would be really supprised official or not that the organiser would get in trouble unless any action they did actually caused a problem.

for example,

if someone turns up, acts like a dick, crashes and kills him self and someone else in the process through no fault of his own, i cant see anyone else being blamed but the driver at fault.

although if the event put attendees or the public in danger through the planned actions, ie maybe stopping a whole bunch of cars in the middle of the road on a blind corner that causes an accident.. well that could be another story, but i think there would be so many loop holes to this that would put blame back onto drivers directly involved for there own actions.

its not like were blocking of roads and using them to race illegally. were just driving from point a to point, people are responsible for them selves...

this is just my 2 cents, and would be very suprised to hear that an organiser had ever been held responsible for anything going down legally in the past where actually activites were legal.

I would be really supprised official or not that the organiser would get in trouble unless any action they did actually caused a problem.

for example,

if someone turns up, acts like a dick, crashes and kills him self and someone else in the process through no fault of his own, i cant see anyone else being blamed but the driver at fault.

although if the event put attendees or the public in danger through the planned actions, ie maybe stopping a whole bunch of cars in the middle of the road on a blind corner that causes an accident.. well that could be another story, but i think there would be so many loop holes to this that would put blame back onto drivers directly involved for there own actions.

its not like were blocking of roads and using them to race illegally. were just driving from point a to point, people are responsible for them selves...

this is just my 2 cents, and would be very suprised to hear that an organiser had ever been held responsible for anything going down legally in the past where actually activites were legal.

So to sum up Ants essay here........... J-RAD stop being a shit stirrer and go organise a cruise :P I did it, no problems and i'm not even a Newcastle Exec :laugh:

Ah well you can be secretary cause you have all the contacts

How's that sounds

Well I do look good in fishnets......

But nah I'm just here for the skids! :woot:

ill do it if u dont wanna jarrad,putty rd it is whos in lol

I wanna do a charity run up there to support the Westpac Chopper but will need to organise that one properly

ill do it if u dont wanna jarrad,putty rd it is whos in lol

There is a putty road cruise on the 16th Dec for members

I wanna do a charity run up there to support the Westpac Chopper but will need to organise that one properly

Yeah that one needs to be done with a lot o planning, will be epic if done properly

me and martin are hunting for roads sat arvo :)

you can do the next one blake :D

Lol skids!!

I might take a run out Dungog Thursday night with Gaz and have a feed at a random pub....

Yep Putty road cruise is good BUT the charity cruise will need some work, I've got a few ideas up my sleeve....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I would agree.  There will be an amount of boost you could run safely with an otherwise factory system, but it would be low enough to not be worth the cost.  And if you are reliving your 20s, you know a 'little bit' was never enough. Personally, if I didn't want to spend the money, then stick with NA bolt-ons, and maybe a tune.
    • Fuark, at least the motor survived. What brand was the fitting that snapped?
    • Wrong question. There's no point in spending the rather large sum of cash and effort to add turbo, without taking it to the "sensible" limit of the motor itself. If you have to upgrade injectors, etc, then so be it. That is a tiny fraction of what it will cost you to turbo it.
    • Measure voltage at the starter solenoid terminal when the key is at start and it has clicked. If it is really low, then the suspicion falls on the ignition switch (contacts or wiring thereof) as causing a voltage drop instead of sending enough volts to throw the solenoid all the way to engage the starter itself. If it is a decent voltage, then the suspicion is on the solenoid. Might have s horted coil, or might hva dirty contacts. Rip the starter off, dismantle, clean up contacts and inspect winding. It might not be possible to see if there is a short in the winding though. I have a spare starter here that I could measure the resistance of the coil, as a guide to about what it should be, if you need a comparison. <parts hoarder>No you cannot have it.</parts hoarder>
    • lights are on just the one click.  
×
×
  • Create New...