Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Fingers crossed mate.

Is the tuner going to hit you up with a free touch up tune?

Haha I hope there'll be some sort of discount - but doubt it. These fellas were pretty quick to charge me for everything single little thing they did. Even things that took 15mins were billed out as a full hour of work. Not sure if I really want to go back there to be honest.

Did try it out with entire exhaust dropped and there was a difference so she's booked in tomorrow for new hi-flow cat. I don't think I've ever heard such insane turbine spool before ;)

That's about right

Well, the new cat is in and I've also straightened out a portion of the exhaust with a dead straight pipe. She feels like they come on a bit sooner....am hoping that I don't regret not going for a set of -7's.

(I'm a sucker for response as you may have guessed)

Regret not going -7? They will be very very little difference between the 2 mate

The problem is somewhere else and not the turbos

Yeh well that's just it - I did about 3-4 months of reading and emailing random peeps to see what these buggers will be like.

I guess there's only one way to find out and that's a re-tune now that there's a better cat and everything has been checked for leaks.

Yeh well that's just it - I did about 3-4 months of reading and emailing random peeps to see what these buggers will be like.

I guess there's only one way to find out and that's a re-tune now that there's a better cat and everything has been checked for leaks.

They for sure dont sound like how they should be peforming, Then again i spent months debating -9s and -5s so what do i know haha :)

They for sure dont sound like how they should be peforming, Then again i spent months debating -9s and -5s so what do i know haha :)

That's exactly it. I guess it's all up to the tune now...need to get that fuel in down low to make more....fumes, and consequently more boost and power. Everyone seems to be saying 16 to 18 pounds by 4000rpm.

So what turbos did you end up going for? The -5's are quite a top end turbo right? The have a much bigger A/R than the -9s?

Went -9 because i came to the conclusion that it would be the most usable power on the streets, no track no drags. End of they day they can always he changed. Still its like naming a child haha

Yes it was stupidly hard choosing between the -7 and -9 units! I came very close to buying -7's and only changed to -9's because peeps say that they give a little bit more up top? Like, they don't run out of puff too early etc.

How do yours perform??

Arent they like a float bearing turbo or is that the 8cm ones?

nothing wrong with bush or floating bearing turbos.

The preload on the actuators can also make a HUGE difference to response on these things, we dial in 10mm minimum on them before install. Just make sure to balance them equally.

check out this GTR with -5's, it picked up 900rpm.

https://fbcdn-sphoto...445052851_n.jpg

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150611091641813&set=a.10150265368356813.328814.728171812&type=1

Well the thing is that I'm already running quite firm actuators that are 15.6psi I think. But I guess the problem lies where the actuators crack. I'll add a little bit more preload to them and see what happens eh?

Maybe that fella in the link who picked up the 900rpm was running very soft actuators?

Well the thing is that I'm already running quite firm actuators that are 15.6psi I think. But I guess the problem lies where the actuators crack. I'll add a little bit more preload to them and see what happens eh?

Maybe that fella in the link who picked up the 900rpm was running very soft actuators?

the ones on that gtr were 15psi ones aswell.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...