Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Get it through street to track. He gets them from ATP turbo in the states an I reckon it would be half the price including postage to your door, compared to the gcg link.

The dollar is pretty decent at the moment as well

Edited by Mitcho_7
  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

wow expensive yes!, but then again that is a genuine Garrett housing and EVERYTHING else is aftermarket, they are apparently cast with different materials as well, some high nickel ni-resist material something or rather =S

More or less true yes, but its not worth 900.

Like someone said already itd be worth half that out of the states. Actually let me confirm that...............................

http://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=tp&Product_Code=ATP-HSG-037&Category_Code=GTH

Same genuine item, with a realistic cost (still a lot of money but its swallowable).

I hope that helps.

More or less true yes, but its not worth 900.

Like someone said already itd be worth half that out of the states. Actually let me confirm that...............................

http://www.atpturbo....tegory_Code=GTH

Same genuine item, with a realistic cost (still a lot of money but its swallowable).

I hope that helps.

So this will fit the GTX3076R as well?

different units, different part numbers GCG listing is the dearer version with upgraded wastegate valve.

Still doesn't matter, with the way the dollar is now why wouldn't u buy one overseas hahaha xD

On a different note, +1 on something wrong with set up hahah, blocked/restrictive cat perhaps? you can still make that same power with a 0.63a/r + more, will just run a bit hotter, don't necessarily need a 0.82a/r

So this will fit the GTX3076R as well?

They are interchangeable, only thing that changes in a GTX unit is compressor wheel and surge slotted comp cover

Edited by OoskylineoO

I had the .82 IW garret on mine, then the .63 external now the .82 external.

.82 was a bit laggy, full boost around 4200, .63 full boost by 3500, .82 external at 3800.

all different to drive

I had the .82 IW garret on mine, then the .63 external now the .82 external.

.82 was a bit laggy, full boost around 4200, .63 full boost by 3500, .82 external at 3800.

all different to drive

Which do you prefer? Do you have a build thread etc? Interesting to hear the differences between the housings :)

They are interchangeable, only thing that changes in a GTX unit is compressor wheel and surge slotted comp cover

I thought gt3076 had a port shrouded compressor inlet as well?

Maybe it was just a pic of the gtx advertised a the gt that I have seen...

I thought gt3076 had a port shrouded compressor inlet as well?

Maybe it was just a pic of the gtx advertised a the gt that I have seen...

You can have it with or without... Mine has the 4in inlet and surge slots, sounds mental too...

Which do you prefer? Do you have a build thread etc? Interesting to hear the differences between the housings :)

yeah id like to know what was preferred most also

No build thread, sadly a bit too muchtime and effort these days. mostly just spam my Facebook with update pics

The .82 internal did its job, but the control of the internal gate is destroyed by external. From that experience if i was to put a large turbo on a car again, IW wouldnt even cross my mind.

the .63 was good, and to be honest it would probably still be on the car if it wasnt for an issue we thought i was having when i put the .63 in there. (turned out not to be the turbo) which was good but id had already bought the .82 to try and solve the issue.

the .82 external isnt very laggy imo, full boost in 4th is around the 3800 mark (19psi) and im pretty happy with that for what it is. overlaying the .63 and the .82 on the dyno the .63 is on about 300-400rpm earlier, but did make a little less in the top end, In saying that 2 mates have the same set up but with a .63 on their neo motor and didnt see the fall in the top end that my 33 did

End of the day car is a daily that sees a bit of track work, so for that effort the .82 is staying on.

the last 2 times we went to do a power run on 19psi turned out to be 40+ degree days. so we never got a proper run. since then ive had a low mount manifold made and installed, and tomorrow ill be going from 3" stainless steel to 4: titanium, so ill try and get some kind of power run in next week

Josh

What pressure springs are you guys using in your wastegates, for the earliest response is it best to run as close to the pressure you want

for example, a tial44mm external and want to run say 20psi, what spring pressure would you want ( assuming you have an electronic boost controller)

pretty sure the one in mine is a 12psi spring, so wondering if it would get better response with a 16psi spring in there?

What pressure springs are you guys using in your wastegates, for the earliest response is it best to run as close to the pressure you want

for example, a tial44mm external and want to run say 20psi, what spring pressure would you want ( assuming you have an electronic boost controller)

pretty sure the one in mine is a 12psi spring, so wondering if it would get better response with a 16psi spring in there?

I run 1 bar of spring, then use the mac valve to push boost pressure on to the top of the gate, helping hold it down. Works better with a 5 port mac valve like mine but the 3 port ones can be setup like that too. I can hold any boost now.

looking at my boost curve seems like the spring or the duty cycle was not done right, maybe resulting in a lazy boost curve etc.. looks like its heading for full boost at or before 4000rpm which is whats the norm round here but then take a further 500rpm or more to get from 15 to 18psi, so yeah i think the spring may need changed to a 1 bar spring and the controller adjusted for a more aggressive build up,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...