Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey SK. I've done my own diagrams from my own understanding, if you'd like to tell me what’s right & wrong 'advantages - disadvantages' about each diagram that would be great.

Owww & please automatically assume that the PCV & so forth are blocked like in your first Zero% plumb back diagram.

From my can design i would think i could only use the B. or C. setup. Personally I think i'd like the A. setup but would need a can with valve at top & bottom?

12805catchsetups.jpg

If anyone wishes to do diagrams too here is a pic they can use. :D

12805engine1-med.jpg

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

OK... i am making my own catch can this weekend

100% plumback, on a rb25det

my first question is.... where is the pcv valve?? can someone please circle it in the picture above? I roughly get the idea.. but perhaps a picture of the pcv valve once it has been moved and whatever else that has to be done to it.. and the blocking off of the camcover?

2nd question, where can i get Braided Stainless hoses from?

all i have seemed to find are braided sleeves that fit over the original silicon hoses... like this http://i12.ebayimg.com/02/i/01/3e/34/47_1.JPG

Is this how it is done, or is there an actual hose that can be purchased sumwhere?

Thnx

cant upload picture of my layout? but if sum1 willign to host i can email

This one I call the 50% plumb back, because half of the time (no boost times) the air from the catch can is being sucked into the inlet manifold via the PCV valve;

rb25det50PlumbBack.jpg  

It is not my favourite, because you can still get a bit of oily air into the engine, but since it doesn't go in under boost (the PCV valve is closed then) detonation isn't much of an issue.  At least you don't get any oil into the intercooler and its pipework.

Hope that helps:cheers:

SK - I was looking into this setup and i think i understand the concept but do you think there could be a problem with this sort of setup.

From my understanding it would be bad to pressurise the sump but it seams that's what it would happen while under boost as the oily air would have nowhere to go.

Did i miss something?

Yah,

I’m thinking the same thing. Although, under vacuum, the vapor would flow through the PCV valve, and be ingested. Under boost, the valve would close, ( and with the pipe in front of the turbo blocked) the canister / crankcase would just slightly pressurize, more importantly, LACK any cross flow of air to rid the oily vapor.

In any case, I thought of running a crank case vacuum pump --> http://www.aerospacecomponents.com/vacp.htm

Id could then hook up a filtered intake to the sump / crankcase and have a continuasally flowing draft through the engine, removing oily vapor and achieving slight power gains from a higher pressure deferential from combustion chamber to crankcase....?

Just some mental vomit

I'm still waiting for Sydneykid's comments on my post above.  :)

Sorry, been a bit busy...

Being a one way valve, the PCV valve stops any boost (pressure) getting into the hoses and the catch can. The only "pressure" is blow by, and the volume of the can and hoses can accomodate this. The small amount of contained pressure is rapidly relieved every time you back off (eg; change gear).

I would not suggest this option for cars with lots of blow by or automatics or cars that spend a lot of their time under boost (eg; circuit work). As I said in the original post it is not my system of choice, it's a compromise to keep oil out of the turbo, intercooler and pipework and still be sealed to atmosphere (legal).

I have set this system up on a number of cars and it works OK Monday to Friday. On weekends the guys stick a filter on the can (to replace the flow that goes to the plenum). The "filter" can be a simple plastic fuel filter like you see on non fuel injected cars, it just plugs in to the can outlet hose.

Hope that clarifies:cheers:

Thanx. SK that clarifies things.

I was looking into the 50% plumb back option as i'm mainly concerned in blow by under boost causing detonation and i also wanna keep my new cooler piping nice and clear. My car is also an Auto so this option would not really suit me.

So basically if i wanna make sure i get no blow by under boost i would have to go the 100% not legal way and filter it to atmo. :)

I just may leave everything intact on the intake manifold side and intercept the blow by hose going into the duct and put a can in between hoping it catches as much as possible.

Would that be OK? It would still be 100% plumb back but only the on boost blow by would be goin thru the can eliminating the detonation and you would possibly need less outlets on the can.

Thanx. SK that clarifies things.

I was looking into the 50% plumb back option as i'm mainly concerned in blow by under boost causing detonation and i also wanna keep my new cooler piping nice and clear. My car is also an Auto so this option would not really suit me.

So basically if i wanna make sure i get no blow by under boost i would have to go the 100% not legal way and filter it to atmo.  :)

I just may leave everything intact on the intake manifold side and intercept the blow by hose going into the duct and put a can in between hoping it catches as much as possible.

Would that be OK? It would still be 100% plumb back but only the on boost blow by would be goin thru the can eliminating the detonation and you would possibly need less outlets on the can.

If you take the velocity out of the air flow (use a big enough can and large diameter hoses) and fill the can with stainless steel wool, then you should clean up the air pretty well. You could also put a filter inline with the hose, one of those cheap plastic fuel filters with right size fittings. That will trap any oil that escapes the can and stop it going into the inlet. Keep an eye on the filter and when it gets black change it, they only cost a couple bucks. We use them on the gearbox and diff breathers on the race cars, so only the air escapes, no oil.:)

Would it be possible to do a diagram for a Rb20 ....coz i'm still not quite clear on how i would fit mine up properly.....  

thanks

Matt

Hi Matt, the only difference between an RB20 and an RB25 is the PCV valve is screwed into the plenum chamber on the RB20. So it makes it easier, you don't have to remove it from the cam cover.:)

So do i run both lines from both cam covers to the catch can? as my can has a breather on the top

or do i block the (lookin from the front) left side cam cover and run the line to the catch can from the right cam cover and a line out of the can back into the turbo inlet hose with a inline plastic filter like u suggest.

thanks

Matt

So do i run both lines from both cam covers to the catch can? as my can has a breather on the top

Option 1, that's how ours is plumbed, OK on a race car but illegal on a road car.

or do i block the (lookin from the front) left side cam cover and run the line to the catch can from the right cam cover and a line out of the can back into the turbo inlet hose with a inline plastic filter like u suggest.

Option 2, you can do that, at least its legal.

Option 3, same as option 2 but no inline filter and into the PCV valve instead of the turbo inlet. That way its plumb back (clean) when no boost is present, sorta 50% legal.

Option 4, same as option 2 but remove the filter from the can and run the hose to the PCV valve. That's fully legal and only the "under boost" oily air goes through the inlet (fuel) filter. You won't have to change it so often.

Hope that makes sense:cheers:

SK - Since I have an Rb30 block I don't have one of these, but the pipe coming out of the two bolt flange on the exhaust side of the RB25 (near the first head bolt), does this just join to the crankcase with no valves etc? Is it just for pressure equalisation of the top and bottom like on the old cosworth motors? It looks that way from the one I had a glimpse at.

SK - Since I have an Rb30 block I don't have  one of these, but the pipe coming out of the two bolt flange on the exhaust side of the RB25 (near the first head bolt), does this just join to the crankcase with no valves etc? Is it just for pressure equalisation of the top and bottom like on the old cosworth motors? It looks that way from the one I had a glimpse at.

Correct, drain from the front of the cylinder head to the sump. :D

So do i run both lines from both cam covers to the catch can? as my can has a breather on the top

SK, My can doesn’t have a breather on top, just two nozzles, can i run both cam cover lines to the can or must i have a breather to release pressure? If so I spose I could run one line to the can & put a filter on the end of the other nozzle, but i dont really want to have an atmos setup & i also dont want oil going into my plenum & so forth, thats why i thought I could run 1 line in & the other line to the sump?

  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Maybe they'll look to do a bunch of presales to help inject some cash fast for their financial issues...
    • Does it also misfire equally when revving?   Josh is very correct in what you should do. The coilpack harness wiring loom itself is a known problem due to its age and the number of heat cycles it has gone through. Throwing parts at a vehicle to diagnose the issue isn't a smart or good way to do it. Secondly, you may have a bad coil pack, you pop replacements in, they fix that issue, but messing with the harness breaks it, so the issue persists. So now you think "well it wasn't the coil packs" and have to continue chasing your tail, potentially swapping back in your shit coil packs and returning the good ones (yes, I've seen people do this because 'it wasn't the problem' and they want to save money). And suddenly, you've got two issues with the same symptoms...   Diagnose, don't use the spare parts shotgun.
    • Well the articals keep saying a Q50s (Skyline in Japan) with a new Manual gearbox. I like the talk about the new looks with the round tail lights. I hope they bring back the retro look like they did with the Z
    • Off the back of feedback we have decided to mix up this next Motorkhana at Avalon to have some targeted skills practice for beginners to advanced. Saturday 6th September 2025 8:30am Capped 26 entries Standard Entry Fee: $89 Members Entry Fee: $55 (SAU Victoria Only) Entries Close: Friday 5th February  Where: 55 beach road Avalon. https://maps.app.goo.gl/HNUE3EuNue3sJxh38 Entries: Limited to 26 entrants (Passengers allowed over the age of 14 with a signed disclaimer and same safety gear) Disclaimer: Download  Please electronically sign and email to [email protected] or print and hand in and Driver Sign In. To compete in this event you will require A valid  AASA General Speed licence or (Day license via the AASA Website for $50) MA Licenses are no longer accepted by AASA https://aasa.com.au/  A helmet, long sleeve clothing and a 1KG mounted fire extinguisher recommended (But not Mandatory). Further details within Supp Regs on the enty link. Entry Link > https://www.sauvic.com.au/entry/deca/20250906 You can bring and have a passenger in the car but they need to comply to the same safety and clothing as driver. Bring your car and get to battle others, win, lose or draw. I can guarantee you will have lots of fun. Any questions email [email protected] Entry List: 1.Anna S 2. Luke S 3. Jesse Givens-Lamb 4. Luca Stamatescu 5. Madeleine Stamatescu    
    • Wanna rewrite all of that in, say, 2 or 3 separate sentences, so that we can read it?
×
×
  • Create New...