Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I'd just like to get a little feedback about a project that I and a few colleagues are taking part in.

Basically it's about creating an option for RB26 projects when it comes to high HP single or even twin turbo applications. Instead of boring the original RB26 block to accommodate 2.7, 2.8, 3.0 or even 3.15L stroker kits and potentially weakening the block, we thought a different block all together might be in order.

The project is a cast iron Nissan RD28 diesel block which just so happens to line up quite nicely with an RB26 head after only a little modification. Thus making an instant 2.8L block without sacrificing cylinder wall thickness i.e. block strength.

As you might be able to see from the photos, the oil gallery wall thickness and the cylinder wall thickness or almost exactly the same with plenty of 'meat on the bone' for larger capacity i.e. 3.2L with the appropriate stroker kit.

In short, this means a very strong cast iron block with no need to fill in some of the oil galleries like you would on an RB26 in order to insure block reliability. This means more cooling/lube for the internals by keeping the all the galleries open,

This block has been line boarded and has a custom Spool mains + plate. As you can see, the setup can obviously handle quite high HP applications and with the appropriate counter-balancing; see the better part of 10000rpm all day if needed.

Its a viable option for anyone considering a higher capacity rebuild with very little boring required if at all.

Certainly poses a better solution to dusting off an old RB30E and hoping for the best lol.

Anyway, I'll let the photos do the talking....

Please PM me any feedback or questions you may have guys and I'll answer them as best I can.

Cheers and enjoy.

post-16592-0-59572100-1341737939_thumb.jpg

post-16592-0-87028300-1341738166_thumb.jpg

post-16592-0-41051300-1341738203_thumb.jpg

post-16592-0-47710800-1341738246_thumb.jpg

post-16592-0-43161500-1341738290_thumb.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/404260-rd28-development/
Share on other sites

Yes, I do apologize for that, I've seen a few too many split on the dyno so I'm a little dirty with regards to them. Each to there own I know and that was just my take on it. Not aiming to offend.

Hardly think your "dusting off an old RB30E and hoping for the best" comment is warranted.

Been done multiple times before, there's even references in the RB30 section to people doing it. There was even some reasoning as to why the RB30 was a better choice but I can't remember them because even at 3.2L... Not enough displacement...

Been done multiple times before, there's even references in the RB30 section to people doing it. There was even some reasoning as to why the RB30 was a better choice but I can't remember them because even at 3.2L... Not enough displacement...

Remember reading this as well.

What's the difference in the height of the block? I'd love some extra displacement, but don't have the room for the 30mm or so than an RB30 would add.

This could be a cheaper option than over $5k for the Spool RB28 kit, or $8k for the Tomei kit!

I'll get back to you about that one.

What's the difference in the height of the block? I'd love some extra displacement, but don't have the room for the 30mm or so than an RB30 would add.

This could be a cheaper option than over $5k for the Spool RB28 kit, or $8k for the Tomei kit!

Yes there is a build in the works but this one in particular uses a 2.8L Nissan Diesel block with the intention to use a 3.2L stroker kit.

If it generates enough interest I'll make a build thread in the appropriate section.

What's the difference in the height of the block? I'd love some extra displacement, but don't have the room for the 30mm or so than an RB30 would add.

This could be a cheaper option than over $5k for the Spool RB28 kit, or $8k for the Tomei kit!

don't expect to get away with anything like this for under 5K

First up, you're going to want to rebuild it anyway, then changes in inlet piping, exhaust, radiator etc etc,

Add on top a retune... its going to be exxy...

Also 40kg heavier is the mention of it over an rb30.

I'll pass for a street car... much better engine choices out there for cheap displacement in a skyline

Yeah, this was really meant to be a solution to block degradation post stroker enhancements to achieve a 3L+ displacement.

More designed for people looking at the 800HP+ area. I think a street car application would be pushing the limits of legality and practicality.

Not unachievable though.....just over kill for street use. The cost is a turn off at the moment but I believe that will change with time, although if your looking for cheap power, the last place you would look is a GTR build. That has at least remained constant over the years.

don't expect to get away with anything like this for under 5K

First up, you're going to want to rebuild it anyway, then changes in inlet piping, exhaust, radiator etc etc,

Add on top a retune... its going to be exxy...

Also 40kg heavier is the mention of it over an rb30.

I'll pass for a street car... much better engine choices out there for cheap displacement in a skyline

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Has equal chance of cleaning an AFM and f**king an AFM. I think you can work out what happened. When the Hitachi ECU sees the AFM die and goes into the associated limp mode, then it will start and run just fine, because it ignores the AFM and just runs on idle maps that will do what it needs to get it going. But there is no proper load signal, so that's about all it can do. My suggestion? If you don't want to go full aftermaket ECU, then get some R35 GTR AFM cards and some housings to put them in, in the stock location, and Nistune the ECU. Better to do a good upgrade than just replace shitty 40 year old tech with the same 40 year old tech.
    • So my car was recently having trouble starting on initial crank, I would need to feather the gas for it to start up but besides that it would start and run fine. So I clicked the idle air control valve (with throttle body cleaner) and cleaned the MAF sensors (with MAF cleaner). The start up issue was fixed and now the car turns over without the assist of the throttle, but the car is in limp mode and wont rev past 2.5k RPM. From what I understand the IACV would not put the car in limp mode, so I am to believe it is the MAF sensors, but it was running fine before and now I cant get it out of limp mode. I cleaned the MAF made sure the o rings were seated properly. Made sure the cables were plugged in properly, the cables also both read the same voltage. Does anybody know why this is or what could be causing this or how to get it out of limp mode?
    • Ooo I might actually come and bring the kids, however will leave the shit box home and take the daily
    • Thanks. Yeah I realised that there's no way I'd be able to cover the holes with the filler, it would just fall through. Thanks again @GTSBoy!
    • That was the reason I asked. If you were going to be fully bodge spec, then that type of filler is the extreme bodge way to fill a large gap. But seeing as you're going to use glass sheet, I would only use that fibre reinforced filler if there are places that need a "bit more" after you've finished laying in the sheet. Which, ideally, you wouldn't. You might use a blob of it underneath the sheet, if you need to provide some support from under to keep the level of your sheet repair up as high as it needs to be, to minimise the amount of filler you need on top. Even though you're going bodge spec here, using glass instead of metal, the same rules apply wrt not having half inch deep filler on the top of the repair. Thick filler always ends up shitting the bed earlier than thin filler.
×
×
  • Create New...