Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Word.

R33GTS-t

Say for a setup which consists of a frount mount intercooler, full 3 inch exhaust, cold air intake, standard turbo at 12psi what would be the expected increase of a Power FC over a S.A.F.C. fitted to this setup ?

And same question on the same system with a standard turbo high flowed for 16psi ?

I know one benefit would be the removal of the speed/boost restrictors....but I'm interested if there is a major gain between the fitting of a S.A.F.C. over a Power FC

ANDREW

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/
Share on other sites

At 12psi I'd say there would'nt be hardly any benefit in the extra money for the Power FC, however with a large turbo @16psi there would be, considering you may need a Z32 AFM and injectors to safely keep it in tune. It all depends on what power you want for eg. the stock injectors and AFM are good for 210-220rwkw so I'm told. As a guide FMIC,exhaust,SAFC,fuel pump and stock turbo@12psi achieved 188rwkw for my car.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-65289
Share on other sites

You've seen the results shown around here haven't you? Someone got 45rwhp from a tuned SAFC. That really is quite a fair bit, so if you aren't sure I'd just go with a SAFC. It's just cheaper and provides the bulk of the power that the PowerFC gives you.

That said, I'd say the Power FC would probably give you that little bit extra to take you over the 200rwkw mark at 12psi if I use turbomad's and other ppl like Ethan's results as a guide. I have a SAFC which is untuned at the moment, but I'll probably post a thread with my dyno results when I do get it tuned.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-65457
Share on other sites

Sorry if I am hijacking the thread here dude...

Surely there are other concerns other than power when choosing between a PowerFC and the SAFC?

One big one for me would be throttle response and drivability - surely the PowerFC is going to give you sharper mapping of the timing, ignition, fuel and boost in a coordinated way to make the overall driving experience more fun (and give a few more kw)?

If you were to start from scratch (like I am with a freshly imported R33 GTST), wouldnt the PowerFC and the boost control module be a better choice than a SAFC and separate boost controller?

I have used bleed valves before on my WRX, and they were awful - boost would bleed away at the top end when you want it... an EBC totally changed the power curve of the car so I dont think I would be happy with that to go with a SAFC.

So that means the SAFC with AVC-R (I think thats the Apexi boost controller?) vs the PowerFC and boost module is the comparison.

The SAFC/AVC-R setup is a little cheaper, but surely you lose crispness in power delivery and some Kw as you cant adjust timing (or am I incorrect??).

I had a Unichip and once they leaned up the fuel AND advanced the timing appropriately the WRX was so much crisper and responsive to drive it felt like a different car... just my 2cents.

Conrad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66084
Share on other sites

Conrad

the boost control option on the PFC is crap, yes it does the job but no where as good as the AVCR.

the SAFC does the fuel side and allows manual advanment of the timing. while the PFC controls the fuel and timing and has more tuning points.

drivability isn't that different, but they main guide i'd go with is if you plab on upgrading the turbo in the future. if so go the PFC as the safc just want cut the mustard once the stock injectors reach 100% duty cycle.

to answer Andrews (peakRPM) question the PFC would give a better power return due to it controlling both fuel and timing and having more mapping points.It would also allow you to do further mods more easily in the future such as bigger injectors, turbo etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66093
Share on other sites

skyzer33, can you give me some more info on your points?

Why is the boost control on the PFC crap, whats wrong with it?

And what do you mean 'manual advancement' of the timing?

Do you mean by change the AFM signal it inadvertantly causes some level of timing change, or does it actually have timing maps? I checked the website and it doesnt really talk about anything other than fuel mapping...

So what would you recommend - using a SAFC and an AVC-R together? I guess if its cheaper and easy to map than the PFC it would be an ok option as I dont plan on replacing the turbo with a different one (unless it lets go then I might jump up to something larger.. maybe).

Thanks for the info, I am still getting up to speed on this gear for the R33 - the WRX was great with a Unichip and boost module, but obviously the skyline is a different beast (and I really hate the self learning dribble with the factory ecu's part of my reasoning for wanting a replacement ecu rather than an intercept unit).

Ta

Conrad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66687
Share on other sites

If you don't plan on replacing the turbo then go the SAFC. Remember if you go a large turbo you may have to change injectors and AFM which in turn will demand the fitment of the Power FC, it kind of snowballs in price at this stage. This is where I am at the moment, I'm looking for a suitable turbo that will run my injectors and AFM and ECU/SAFC to the max and if I can make 210rwkw then that's what I'll have to be happy with.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66739
Share on other sites

Can someone clarify what level of control over ignition timing the SAFC provides? I thought it purely controlled the AFM voltage level in an intercept function to trick the sotck ecu, so you are finitely limited by the fuel maps of the stock ecu and have to deal with the ecu 'learning', and potentially retarding the timing if detonation occurs.

I guess if the SAFC CAN do ignition timing I will look at it..

Ta

Conrad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66832
Share on other sites

slayer

the safc tricks the ecu into thinking ur running stock fuel ratios which allows you to advance the timing without the ecu retarding it thats what i meant by manually adjusting the timing.

why the PFC boost add on is crap. it does its job well but there are some issues with it at higher boost levels. Plus the AVCR is better more features and has fuzzy logic.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66866
Share on other sites

the dyno charts of my car after install of PowerFC WITHOUT tuning jumped about 25rwhp...

After tuning saw more like 45rwhp.

At 12psi (controlled by Blitz Dual SBC), it turns 271.3hp/202kw @ rears.

Will post the dyno chart if i get a chance. Stock, plug-in, tune, re-tune are all on the same graph.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66936
Share on other sites

Power FC is the way to go, why half do it with an SAFC?

The gains and tuning ability of the power FC make it the better choice especially with the price you can pick them up for second hand these days.....

plug and play

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-66951
Share on other sites

Slayer - The SAFC cannot do ignition control... That's why it's just a SAFC... IF you want ignition control then you'll have to get the ITC.

As someone who's used both (SAFC & Powerfc, (and even unichip)), I can tell you from experience that if you can afford to spend the extra $$$ you fork out for the powerfc is definitely worth it.

That being said, there's nothing wrong with the SAFC for a lightly tuned car with the standard injectors, just beware that it is an interceptor, and doesn't alter the overall tune, it effectively just alters the voltage the ecu see's that the AFM is sending it.

Oh - and the best feature of the powerfc, is you can tell if your car is pinging!

matt

Originally posted by slayer

Can someone clarify what level of control over ignition timing the SAFC provides? I thought it purely controlled the AFM voltage level in an intercept function to trick the sotck ecu, so you are finitely limited by the fuel maps of the stock ecu and have to deal with the ecu 'learning', and potentially retarding the timing if detonation occurs.

I guess if the SAFC CAN do ignition timing I will look at it..

Ta

Conrad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-67031
Share on other sites

LOL - while I'm happy to tell you, my motor doesn't bear much resemblence to an RB25 anymore :D In any case... Most it'll usually go to is between 20-30 @ wot, with the occasional spike to 50, which is usually when I come off the throttle.

When I had my '25, it was about the same...

matt

Originally posted by 2rismo

Out of interest, mate, what does your knock readout go to on different types of fuel, fuel + octane booster etc...

Just interested.

Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4049-safc-or-power-fc/#findComment-67186
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...