Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys,

i think my o2 sensor is dead. my fuel economy sucks (250k's ish on a full tank) and my apexi pen timer doesn't read the o2 sensor value at all. my fuel economy has always been like this so i thought it was normal but reading some threads and doing some searching and it appears my o2 sensor is dead. i wasnt sure if the apexi pen timer was working properly cos it has never read the o2 value always displays "---" but ive checked the wring and it seems fine.

also when i had a dyno run on the dyno bbq day i got 141rwkw and it was running very rich and had some black smoke puff out

does anyone know where to get a new / 2nd hand o2 sensor from? how much?

any help would be great, thanks

Yea you can buy new ones for like ummmm around 150 i think but dont quote me! You can get second hand ones easily from workshops around the place usually like 80 or so not that expensive just make sure its ok before you buy it!

dunno but the 33 ones have 3 wires, im looking at my old one right now, I got a second hand one for like $80 from a workshop up here i know...check around you'll find one easy, they have heaps of them lying around!

nah its cool, ive already got a new o2 sensor just a bitch to fit and ive got really shit tools here. will organise with a mechanic to fit it for me and swap for a new radiator

hi all, have gotten the o2 sensor fitted and done. the ford el one did it fine. the apexi timer now shows the o2 value and it fluctates from 0.30 to 0.20 and 0.10 is this correct? upon de-acceration it goes to 0.02 and 0.01. however if i goto a/f it shows "---" still. am i missing something?

will update when i check my fuel consumption

the light for o2 goes from green to orange to red mainly at green when idle and orange when midrange accel and occasionally a spot of red if i stick it. ive only seen the highest about 0.40 shouldn't it be up near 0.60 ? the range as far as i know was 1.00 to 0.00 correct?

0.50 would be midrrange?

as in not lean and not rich

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...