Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all im about to put my combo into the car going to run pump fuel atm as im 3 hours from the nearest e85 servo!

Any how my combo is

forged rb26

alot of port work done

276 custom grind cams

VCT

6 boost manifold divided

6766 cea divided .84 rear

45 mm turbosmart gate

Just can not find any info on these turbos on a rb26 like dyno sheets or hp figures id like to know what im getting my self into and where i should be on pump fuel hp wise at the wheels in my gtr.

Thx for any help

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/409170-6766-cea-billet-turbo-on-a-rb26/
Share on other sites

Could be the 1.15 rear end, its a big exhaust wheel as it is so the need for the largest possible housing is debatable.

To OP: are you sure you have enough gate for that setup? I would have wanted 50mm at minimum for a single gate on that setup, I wouldnt be scared of a 60mm either.

Thats a 930hp turbo. These things are known to punch above their weight, are you sure E85 would only see 650?

Correct me if I am wrong but PJ has gone 850whp from a similarly sized unit from a 2L on E85?

im not suggesting 730 on pump is whats to be expected, but A: were talking US pump 93, not skip land pump 98 and B: were talking a US result. US results are always higher than ours, no matter what.

700+whp on US-93oct sounds like heaps alright, dyno discrepancy aside (assuming 10% lower reading that is still not far short of 500kw) - would love to know more about the car.

On the flipside, 650whp on 26-28psi - that doesn't sound that huge if talking about a fairly serious setup (using a PT6766 to its potential is pretty serious by my reckoning). What kind of setups are you talking there? A mate of mine's stock stroke RB26 makes 865hp @ 4hubs on 22psi running on E85, which by my reckoning should equate to at least 770awhp/575kw on a Dyno Dynamics dyno.

Thats a 930hp turbo. These things are known to punch above their weight, are you sure E85 would only see 650?

Correct me if I am wrong but PJ has gone 850whp from a similarly sized unit from a 2L on E85?

im not suggesting 730 on pump is whats to be expected, but A: were talking US pump 93, not skip land pump 98 and B: were talking a US result. US results are always higher than ours, no matter what.

I may be thinking about a different turbo. I'll ask the customer. Still fairly new to identifying PT's

as for the US results, well it's about 540rwkw.... so given US results are always very happy (or ours are conservative??) if it's say 10% out, that's high 400's... have no idea if that's realistic for that setup for not.

randomly found this on a Dutch tuning companies site - PT6765 - 611kw. - not sure if fly wheel conversion or at the wheels.

EDIT: never mind, looking at the other results, it looks like they've done some calc to guestimate the engine power... not very useful then...

R34 GTR, (Eddie, DU)

Sky-Eng gebouwde motor

CP zuigers

Crower drijfstangen

HKS nokkenassen en klepveren

N1 oliepomp

Precision billet PT6765 turbo

Sky-Eng carterpan

HKS twin plate clutch

Bosch 1600cc injectoren

Sky-Eng swirl pot met 2 Bosch 044 benzinepompen

Link G4 ECU

820hp @ 2.1 bar op E85 benzine

US spec 93 is better than our 98 for sure. I would put our 98 closer to US 91, but a little better. There is no direct comparison.

As has been said, 700+ is a big number for pump fuel. Yet im not surprised. Its likely to be calculated engine HP, plus the level of discrepancy that we are used to seeing.

When I saw the result I gauged 450rwkw, which is a walk in the park for a 6766, the only questionable thing is US pump 93 and if its good enough to support the number.

In NZ we have Dyno Dynamics, Dynojets, and mainly Dynapacks - I have considered doing comparisons between those 3 though the results I have seen from the bunch seem to have Dynojets reading marginally lower than the Dynapacks and basically add 8%-12% to Dyno Dynamics results to get Dynojet/Dynapack equivalent results.

We are putting car on my Dyno Jet and on a Mustang in the same day soon just for fun to end the what ifs and I thinks around here will be fun just to see the difference.

I post up the findings.

Edited by Weapon X

Mustang dynos don't seem to read quite as low as Dyno Dynamics dynos with "typical" setups, assuming you don't count the way the Brits tend to set up DD dynos (to estimate Flywheel).

Will be interesting to see the DD vs Mustang comparison

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...