Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

I have a few thermofans left over from previous project cars and I'm after advice on which fan(s) are best suited to an R32 GTR.

I have:

-Spal 16" skew blade puller, is about 85mm thick where motor is.

-Or 2x Spal 12" skew blade pullers.

Just after some confirmation on which setup I should keep before I list on ebay.

Cheers.

  • 2 weeks later...

just search their cfm rating.

Odds on there wouldnt be much in it. So it would otherwise lead to what would be easier to fit (properly) with an associated shroud and thermoswitch n relay etc...

Iv got twin 12" thermos on a 52mm radiator + shroud n i had to mod the fan n the power steering pipe a bit so that it would all fit without interference.

A smaller radiator would be no issue tho. But if you were going to go this size id reccomend going for the big single.

hehehe, in skylines it all comes back to the big single or twins debate doesnt it... :P

It's hard to convince people that

really? i thought it was the other way around?

even as a thermofan user id agree that the stock fan does move more than enough air, also it is self regulating on how hard it 'pulls' based on the temps encountered.

The advantage of thermofans is that they dont run all the time and therefore take power from the motor at all times like the stock fan. In fact with my 52mm alloy radiator the thermofans dont even come on in the winter months unless i get into stop start traffic. Even then they only come on for about 90-120 seconds per cycle.

Also that the old clutch fans are often wearing out n becoming unreliable. Therefore alternatives are worh considering.

Edited by jjman

the power lost by a clutch fan is bugger all, especially since it only engages fully at higher temps. thermo fans don't have a direct drag on the motor, but they increase the load on the alternator, which puts more load on the engine. so they aren't a free power mod as some people believe.

a big fan draws more air than a small fan as it's the tips of the fan that draw the most air as they are travelling faster than the middle of the fan (same rpm, but they travel a further distance). plenty of cars with thermo fans run 2 fans as it allows them to have different stages of cooling. for example, in some cars, in normal conditions/temps, one fan is used for engine cooling, while the other will come on when the air con is turned on.

as for looking for alternatives, sure you could look at fitting thermos, or you could just buy a new clutch for the fan.

personally, if i was going to run a thermo setup, i'd just use the factory setup off another car, and trim the shrouds as need be. i'd be looking at something off a late model falcon, magna or of a smaller fwd car such as a pulsar, corolla, etc. i'd just find something with a similar sized radiator and go from there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...