Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sure.. and I think you make a good point in that if you are going FI, to do it properly. We don't want to see anyone buying a $5k turbo kit, fitting it, winding the boost up and ending up with a pile of molten metal..

Power can be addictive too.. some just want simple NA mods to make few extra KW.. then want more and go with cams and ECU tune.. and eventually realise they have to go FI to get any more.. and could have gone straight to a FI setup with less $$ in the first place. I guess that is what you are trying to warn against?

Some are happy with just a bit more than stock, and will leave there.

^this.

It all depends on what you want out of your system. Do you want a circuit monster, a dyno doll, a luxe spec machine etc?

Personally, with the V35, I'd just make her look the part, give her a little more go than stock (similar mods to Andrew) and be fine.

For raw power, probably grab a 32 Gt-R or something from that era and work it. We'll see. :)

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Spot on. It's easy to get bitten by the bug and it definitely bit me on the arse mighty hard. After the CAI and ignition system weren't enough, it was then the nitrous, then it was the turbo. From there on in, I swore to myself to go straight to the top if I wanted serious power but that's in a distant future for this animal, I reckon. We'll see. :)

Hopefully I haven't made myself out to be a pretentious arsehole in voicing my opinion and let's face it, we all have one (of each).

It's all good.. I got fried recently for sharing my opinion on suspension bracing, after finding it made no noticable difference on my old J30.. the J30 copped a bit of a verbal in the process!!..

Thanks for the replies.

Yeah I'm thinking of starting off with the 5/16 basic plenum spacer and a z tube. I'm actually not spending any money on these myself - just got asked what I'd like for my birthday and as there's nothing else I really want atm I'm happy to get these items.

tbh I'm kinda over spending heaps on my engine and car (have had 2 wrx's and an s15), and have been more happy with the last 2 NA cars I've had (s2000, v35) than my first few turbo cars which had a lot more power - so it's not all about power for me, but I guess I'm kinda curious and keen on extracting a little more power from the engine (not too fussed on massive power gains).

thanks

Ok so an update

I've decided to go with a motordyne basic plenum spacer, a z-tube and perhaps even a rev-up airbox.

Now here's a question - the z-tube is basically a tube that costs around 150 shipped. Could I get away with buying a cheapo intake kit from ebay (which comes with required aluminium piping) and have it work just as well as the z-tube? I'm thinking of going this route as theres a considerable cost saving.

the Z-tube isn't really going to yelid you any extra KWs, so if you can find a tube of the same size/shape, it should give a similar 'sound'. However, the danger of using aluminium instead of plastic is it will tend to conduct more heat into the air inside.

If you want the Z-Tube and Rev-up air box check out Perri Infiniti on eBay, they do a package deal on parts

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/OEM-NISSAN-INTAKE-Z-TUBE-REV-UP-AIRBOX-K-N-DROP-FILTER-KIT-NEW-/261103668417?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3ccafdccc1#ht_4394wt_962

I got both items plus the Motordyne basic spacer for $400 shipped to Geelong VIC. I went with this setup over the Pop Charger to keep a factory look and to save on heat soak. Nissan would spend R&D on a new air box and different intake tube for the Z for no gain (even if its just throttle response, that's still a gain).

I installed a light weight pulley, plenum spacer, throttle body spacer and jwt intake with z tube, I love the sound the intake gives, it's amazing! Performance, I felt a little bit of mid-end power and torque, not much though, but friend said he felt a big difference, maybe it's just me

I installed a light weight pulley, plenum spacer, throttle body spacer and jwt intake with z tube, I love the sound the intake gives, it's amazing! Performance, I felt a little bit of mid-end power and torque, not much though, but friend said he felt a big difference, maybe it's just me

i've done the same with out the pulley, definately noticed better performance :thumbsup:
  • 1 month later...

hey guys just wanting some advice with regards to my high flow cat installation -

1. how long should the job take at an exhaust shop? (hopefully i'll be taking it in to exhaust plus to get them fitted and wanted to know how much time it should be taking them)

2. do i need to retain the stock cat heat sheilds, or can i do away with them?

thanks

oh and I also bought a z tube, rev-up airbox and k&n filter package! can't wait till everything is in.

With the HFC's, plenum spacer, z tube, rev-up airbox and k&n filter, should I be expecting around 160rwkw?

Changing over cats should take about an hour. But my passenger side cat lightly touched the underbody, so I had to pay $100 to get it cut and re-welded at a slightly different angle. They were supposed to be bolt-on ....

Yep around 160rwkw sounds about right. Depending no the dyno maybe even a touch more depending on whether you have touched the rest of the exhaust or not.

I have kinetix's "revised" hi-flow cats (supposed have better clearance) and I had to bend the heat shield attached to the underbody to stop it from touching... This was also the passenger side like Nightcrawler

Yeah but there are dynos and then there are dynos. It is laughable some of the people here in Adelaide that have had their cars tuned/dynod at well known workshops with 'happy' dynos, then they come to one of our club dyno days at Willall Racing, and are very sadly disappointed that their insanely high magical dyno number is only 80% of the 'happy' dyno number. Typically dyno dynamics are 10-20% higher than mainline dynos, as they use a fudged 'X factor' to allow for ramp up rates, tyre profiles, number of cylinders that car has, humidity, temperature etc etc. If you change this 'X factor' number it changes the dyno figure significantly. Mainline dynos have no such bs, and run a raw number that cannot be fudged.

The only way to really compare cars power levels is to run the cars on the same dyno on the same day.

Ok it the high flow cats installed and here's what I think -

The car definitely feels more responsive, the revs seem to climb at a faster rate than before. The car feels a little more powerful towards the top of the rpm range. The sound is probably the most significant change, it definitely sounds beefier - which is great as I can hardly hear the annoying rattling sound I sometimes get from under the car when I'm in high gear/low rpm lol.

I can't wait for my z-tube/rev-up airbox/k&n combo and plenum spacer to arrive :D

I reckon after these mods the only other two performance mods I might do is a tune (any help on where to tune in Adelaide would be great :D) and a y-pipe (although no too sure if it'll be worth it).

Just a quick update -

got the plenum spacer, z tube and rev-up airbox installed the other night.

After having driven the car a bit, it's noticeably more responsive and the sound coming from the engine bay is deafinately a little throatier. I'll be dyno'ing the car sometime soon to see how much power I'm making with all these mods. As it is the car is about as quick as I want it to be, the only thing I might do in the future is try to get some more low down torque (don't know what mods would be best for this).

I'll probably have to do the throttle body reset however because when I start my car up sometimes (after it's warmed up) the idle is a little funny.

Would I recommend these mods?

All depends on what you want, if it's just more power then go turbo or sc. However if like me you just want a more responsive engine with a little more power, than these mods are great.

^^ you can't 'tune' a V35 .... unless you have the Osiris software or a stand-alone interceptor like my SAFCII or a Unichip (or equivalent).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Me, I would happly spend some more coin on better tyres for my street car  Will they work, yes, of course, but why substitute some dry grip/braking distance, and wet weather grip/braking distance on what is really old tech to save some coin on your "precious" street car In the end it might not be you that farks up, it's the thousands of other idiots on the street that you need to worry about  For a street car that gets some "fun time", I have found that a quality tyre that can handle dry, wet, cold (Canberra gets pretty cold) and hot conditions, which may costs a little more, is great insurance  From my experience with them (driving around Goulburn in the winter) the RE003's are pretty poor in cold and/or wet conditions on the street If RS4's didn't hate gripping in the cold I would be running them always on the street,  great in the dry, OK in the wet, but, they do hate the cold, with a passion, I run PS5's year round now, basically, I've found the PS5 to be a great year round street tyre for all conditions, they last well, and are mid range pricing wise TL;DR. Tyre choice is probably like what brand and grade oil you should use, ask 10 people, and get 10 different answers... LOL
    • Extend the sensor out of the car, put it in a pot of oil, heat oil up. You'll get to 80-120 then 馃槢
    • Yeah - I tried throwing the formulas from ChatGPT and it tried it's best as it told me that the Formula in HPTuners as requested is a Linear function, but the original data I provided it (resistance to temp) is not linear and thus it kept trying to suggest formulas that would be more accurate in regions I actually want it to be accurate in. But I didn't quite understand it at the time. I have now thrown the data into graphs and can clearly see they're all different shapes. Given it's an oil temp sensor I probably want it to be most accurate between 80 and 120c - So I don't really see much alternative other than driving the hell out of the car and letting it cool down from 120C, noting the voltage on the sensor as it chills out. But at that point if I write it down, well, I'll be able to know this from the voltage. Would look pretty stupid on a datalog or a video showing me going down the straight at 0.265V Oil temp 
    • Yeah, it looks like it's being ran as a constant current setup is my guess. Get some more data points, reading the degrees C on the gauge, and what the voltage is you're seeing out of it. The sensor itself is not linear, even in smaller ranges of like 20 - 60 it's non linear. But if we can get some good plots, particularly at those 5volt steps, it will be very easy to work out, and then I can give you a logarithmic formula if its you need an actual formula. Also, very likely ChatGPT will lead you astray with some of this stuff, as it totally depends on how the circuit is built.
    • So to further complicate things or hopefully explain better: This is a VDO sensor. It clearly does this math inside the gauge itself... because it displays a temperature in C to me instead of a voltage. The signal wire to the gauge is in Volts, not Ohms. I have just teed into this and sent it to the ECU. ChatGPT spat this out: Temperature (脗掳C) Thermistor Resistance (脦漏) Voltage Output (V) -40 36563.56 4.973962698 -35 26284.63 4.963854097 -30 19149 4.950518086 -25 14127.68 4.933166097 -20 10504.68 4.910527969 -15 7721.35 4.879055954 -10 5720.88 4.838133512 -5 4284.03 4.786165799 0 3240.18 4.721119717 5 2473.6 4.640900563 10 1905.87 4.543692515 15 1486.65 4.429695182 20 1168.64 4.296344225 25 926.71 4.144091368 30 739.98 3.972492431 35 594.9 3.782907287 40 481.53 3.577860996 45 392.57 3.361217186 50 322.17 3.136573398 55 266.19 2.908608143 60 221.17 2.68039363 65 184.72 2.455599277 70 155.29 2.239608872 75 131.38 2.035132288 80 112.08 1.846579676 85 96.4 1.674774149 90 82.96 1.511882199 95 71.44 1.359001674 100 61.92 1.222169588 105 54.01 1.100403407 110 47.24 0.989775394 115 41.42 0.889528391 120 36.51 0.800974069 125 32.38 0.723478416 130 28.81 0.654148313 135 25.7 0.591893137 140 23 0.536380597 145 20.68 0.487551867 150 18.59 0.442640126 155 16.74 0.40213318 160 15.11 0.365841848 165 13.66 0.333073247 170 12.38 0.303758956 175 11.25 0.277572169 180 10.24 0.253917873
  • Create New...