Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I took my R32 GTR down to the drags tonight for the first time, and while I ran an 11.7 which I'm reasonably happy with I'm a bit concerned about the MPH. I have read quite a number of threads on here and given what others have run with similar setups I thought I would be quicker.

My previous R32 made 410rwhp (roller dyno) and this one made 470rwhp on a hub dyno. Now sure, dynos are dynos and the true measure is MPH at the strip. However, my last 32 did 11.8 @ 118mph on that horsepower, and my current 32 went almost dead on the same at 117.5mph. I had 4 runs all up, 11.7 then missed gears on the next 2 and then the fourth run I did a 12.0 @ 116mph.

I read through threads such as Marko's and with 325rwkw he was getting low 11s so I thought I would at least get 120-122mph. I have also studied the how to launch your GTR threads, the quarter mile in your 34 GTR thread etc etc. http://www.skylinesa...-gtr-the-creek/

Being that it was my first time at the drags with this car I didn't think I was going to get a great ET but should I have been expecting a higher mile per hour, or is it about on the money?

Here are the results from my first and last runs:

First

60' - 1.780

330' - 4.968

660' - 7.613 (speed was 151.73kph)

1000' - 9.863

ET - 11.776

MPH - 117.49 (189.08kph)

Fourth

60' - 1.757

330' - 5.052

660' - 7.771 (speed was 147.84kph)

1000' - 10.112

ET - 12.062

MPH - 116.73 (187.85kph)

The car's running a GT3582 @ c.19-20psi, has cams but not sure of specs, twin plate clutch. Tyres are Falken Ziex ZE912s (245s). Launch method was supposed to have been slip the clutch out at about 7000rpm but it turned into more of a sidestep at 7000rpm, and I tried to change gears as quickly as I could at about 7500rpm.

Any insight, particularly with reference to the above times at various points down the track, is muchly appreciated so I can practice a little more knowledgeably next time :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/415939-r32-gtr-is-my-mph-low/
Share on other sites

In a heavier than stock R33 GTR (larger sump, radiator, brakes, coolers, 18" wheels etc) - I was running 11.4 @ 124mph with 335-340rwkw.

You are in a much lighter car with a tad less power (410rwhp = 305rwkw), so you should be pretty much the same to be honest. I'd say your setup has issues.

Your 60fts are good (so it's not a clutch problem) and your MPH isn't necessarily "too" low, but you would expect to be 120-122MPH at the least and that means you are probably not even making 305rwkw to be honest. A friend of mine years ago ran 117-118mph on stock turbos in a R32 GTR :)

Also the fact you have a GT35 @ 20psi and only 305rwkw, is also telling something. A GT35 on that much boost you'd be expecting closer to 350-370rwkw on a stock motor. So combined with the MPH, it's telling you there is something pretty wrong to be a good 8-10MPH down on what that turbo/setup is capable of.

Hi guys, many thanks for the responses. Mico, I'm not sure to be honest mate, the cams were installed by the previous owner. As R31Nismoid indicated the MPH seems reasonable for a low 300 kilowatts but given it last dyno'd at 470rwhp (hub) I agree, there must be something at fault with the setup.

Thanks guys, I will look into it :) As least there's potentially a few more MPH in it without changing too much!

Often you'll find hub results are not the same as a chassis dyno. They tend to read higher, so I'd still say you've got less than 300rwkw (which 117mph would suggest).

So easily down 50-70rwkw, which you'll notice once you get it - it'll be a different car and you will easily pick up 8MPH. Possibly a bit more.

To give you some perspective. A GT3076 (500-550hp turbo) will make around 300rwkw on 20-22psi. You have a 700hp turbo, that on 20psi has made 350/370rwkw on many many cars. A quick check of the dyno results thread would show you how easy and how many have done it :

Cheers mate, I keep a regular eye on that thread which is why I thought something was amiss given my 118ish mph. The ~330rwkw mark was always my 'target' I suppose so I'll get it back on the dyno in the new year and see if we can't figure out what's happening.

Cheers again for the feedback, appreciate it :)

  • 4 months later...

i ran 11.8 on 234kw on 98 octane stock turbos just replaced with steel wheels
stock ecu , ku31s all round. ( excuse my screaming after the race... was tad excited )


time slip is in description.

got abit of a list of parts to buy.... keen to see my future result. Edited by sultanaz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...