Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so i just bought skyline gts rb20 about month ago.Car got avg body kit and the new seats been changed,from outside it looks all soild.Now i want some power so this guy said rb25t engine with r33 white car (maybe higher km).What we thinking of doing is putting changing engine and selling back the r33 white for good price.and between that it will cost me around $1000nz

What im trying to find out is does it really matter if engine done higher km cause my machin keep saying its the outside body effects more then engine.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/417074-higher-km-done-on-rb25det/
Share on other sites

Ok, so ignoring your poor English, i think i get what you're saying.

It can matter if the engine has higher mileage. It depends on whether it's had a hard life. Most people will usually be a bit reluctanct to buy a car with very high mileage, but if it's only a bit higher than normal it won't be much of an issue if it runs ok.

Having said all that, while it's good to have a car with a nice body, it's always good to have an engine in good condition. No point having a car that looks good if it runs like crap and breaks down a lot.

Ok, so ignoring your poor English, i think i get what you're saying.

It can matter if the engine has higher mileage. It depends on whether it's had a hard life. Most people will usually be a bit reluctanct to buy a car with very high mileage, but if it's only a bit higher than normal it won't be much of an issue if it runs ok.

Having said all that, while it's good to have a car with a nice body, it's always good to have an engine in good condition. No point having a car that looks good if it runs like crap and breaks down a lot.

lol.. i was bit confused too..

my engine has close to 200 000km's and still very healthy, i agree with above, the engine is the heart of it , you dont want a slapped out motor.

I think you should listen to the motor stone cold, if its quiet then thats a start then do the usual comp test, visual inspections etc

I just rebuilt a 25 with 200,000k's on it(assuming the cluster was correct).

Was very clean inside but even still the valve guides were worn out of spec and the bearings weren't looking great. It probably would have been fine to run as is but just something to keep in mind, Even in good shape with higher K's internal parts will have more wear than an engine with lower K's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...