Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just had my car dynoed today to see what sorta power i was making..

Car made 187kw at the wheels...not sure if its any good :(

car is still runnin factory turbo but boosted to 13psi, front mount and exhaust...

Im happy with the run but curious to see what sorta pwr others are makin with a standard turbo

I guess next mod has to be a computer

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42075-1st-dyno-run-for-the-34/
Share on other sites

That's good to know. I didn't know you could adjust the timing without a replacement ecu. I'm definitely getting a front mount given your results.

Do you still have a cat in there? I've got a "high flow" 3" but realistically they aren't that high flow. You can't proper high flow ones here, have to import them yourself.

Do you have a flatspot at all?

hey bob...im runnin a full blitz exhausted but still using the original cat in the car...all they did was advance the timing...or could it be the ignition timing...not sure...they adjusted the sensor on the front of the motor which i assume is the timing....cams in the car are still stock. i will try and upload the dyno graph....i do have a flat spot at bout 135km but then picks up again...its a fairly big drop as well

Mine was much the same before the PFC and Apexi filter. Now have 210 at the wheels (@ 1 bar) and that will do me nicely. Graph at .7bar says 186rwkw so I'm happy. Can't remember what revs that was at but I do remember that it does tail off fairly steeply and doesn't hold the boost all the way thru.

Cheers

Muz

Nobody knows but there was a guy who went to all the effort and expense of before and after dyno runs on the same day at all adjustmements for the benefit of the forums (can't remember if it was here or SDU). Got no improvement, not even a change if I recall correctly.

Also, I'm not sure about the GTT being detuned with the cams when it has what is it 30?? odd kw more than the r33

Just had my car dynoed today to see what sorta power i was making..

Car made 187kw at the wheels...not sure if its any good :)

car is still runnin factory turbo but boosted to 13psi,  front mount and exhaust...

Im happy with the run but curious to see what sorta pwr others are makin with a standard turbo

I guess next mod has to be a computer

About a year ago I got 182 rwkws - you need to remember guys that different dynos will give different results and so will temperatures and other things. Mine was on DynoDynamics with 10 PSI, stock turbo, stock ic, pod filter and 3 inch cat-back only exhaust - no high flow cat or front pipes.

Now I have more mods so who knows??? I expect closer to 190 on same dyno / boost.

Ben from HPI [R34 GTT project] didnt get a lot of respone out of the CAM gears either from memory - he also put tomei cams in, which may have helped can't remember.

With reference to HPI on the R34 GTT, I think what Ben had said was that the Tomei cams were just about spot on in their design and that no benefit was gained from the adjustable cam gear (exhaust only remember guys) but that there were worthwhile gains to be had without the Poncams but with the adjustable cam gear. I think what Ben was alluding to was that for cheap power upgrade, the cam gear would deliver bang for the bucks but step up to the Poncams and no discernable gain was to be had.

Must have read and re-read that article 20 times. It's where I get all my inspiration from.

cheers

Muz

Ok guys kinda off topic but anyways here goes. I'll be getting my PFC tuned soon, any places u think i should check out. Already called places like ICe and Hyper. Also I got the HKS ex cam gear, sort of wish that i saw this thread b4 i ordered it tho. lol

PS : I used to have the emange in my GTT34. um........ :)

I was the one who went to all the (great) expense of testing the Cam Gear in an R34.

I took it to H-Tech Autosports in Vermont and it cost me a packet.

For what I paid I could havebought and tunded a S-AFC!!

Do a search for Cam Gear Install and you will find the article.

Don't bother buying one fo the R34. Waste of Money.

BASS OUT

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...