Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is it possible to change the front sway bar yourself with just a garage jack/stands or would that be rather a job

for a professional post lift and an air impact driver?

I did this kind of work before but only on MacPherson type suspension and it was always good having had the car on a lift.

Thanks ..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421303-r33-front-sway-bar-swap-diy/
Share on other sites

I did it on a hoist last week. I had put it off until I could get it on a hoist, because doing it on stands is not as easy. I actually avoid using chassis stands on the front of Skylines because there's not really anywhere to put them where they won't cause damage. If you put them under the lower control arm inner pivots then they get in the way of doing the anti-roll bar swap.

It can be done on stands with wheels off. It's much easier on a hoist.

Hi!

Thanks for that, so the hoist it is .. or is it not?

There are some things you can do relatively easy, as changing the exhaust section.

I usually use the garage jack under the front cross member or the differential on the rear to jack up the car .

Then the chassis stands with rubber adapters under the sills.

However, I actually don't trust the sills too much ..

post-33912-0-56095100-1362750862_thumb.jpg

Edited by Torques

Yuh, even though the sills are strengthened at the jacking points, they are only really intended to work with something that looks exactly like the top of the factory jack. Otherwise you can crush the lip of the sill flat.

Chassis stands are supposed to go under chassis rails or under suspension mounting points. The problem there is that the front end of the rails under a Skyline are as soft as butter and typical stands will dent them inwards (which is defectable, would you believe??!! That's another reason why I don't like using a trolley jack under the front cross member. It's also easy to dent and I can't get a normal trolley under the GTR front bar unless it's already jacked up anyway - the cross member is too far back to get it from ground height). And as I said, if you put them under the front lower arm inner pivots it crowds the work area a bit. You can still do a bar swap that way, just not as easy as on a hoist.

By all means, do it on stands. But do it on a hoist if you have access to one.

I can't drive my car up onto ramps. They'd need to be 4m long to have a shallow enough slope to go under the GTR bar. Therefore I never consider them.

But assuming you can get your car up onto supports that go under the wheels....then yes, you could do it that way. That would be the same as doing it on a hoist except that you're lying down instead of standing up!! It is certainly easier to access the ends of the bar with the wheels off. But can be done with them still on.

How about the Sway Bar?

Isn't it under tension?

With my other cars the weight of the car had to be on the wheels, otherwise the bar would not fit ..

Edited by Torques

Well, if the car was on a hoist or on ramps, then you'd be fine......mine was done on hoist with wheels on. If perchance you had it on stands with the wheels hanging, you might not be able to put enough force on it to get it apart/put it back together. But that wouldn't be a problem. You'd just have to put it back on the ground to put the weight back on the suspension. Sure, that would mean putting it down on blocks/ramps/whatever, but it's not a deal breaker.

Doing them on ramps is a doddle, in fact I'd say on a low car, it would almost be easier & quicker to remove the front bar so you could do it this way.

I always do them on ramps as everything lines up easily.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I neglected to respond to this previously. Get it up to 100 psi, and then you'll be OK.
    • I agree with everything else, except (and I'm rethinking this as it wasn't setup how my brain first though) if the sensor is at the end of a hose which is how it has been recommended to isolate it from vibrations, then if that line had a small hole in, I could foresee potentially (not a fluid dynamic specialist) the ability for it to see a lower pressure at the sensor. But thinking through, said sensor was in the actual block, HOWEVER it was also the sensor itself that broke, so oil pressure may not have been fully reaching the sensor still. So I'm still in my same theory.   However, I 100% would be saying COOL THE OIL DOWN if it's at 125c. That would be an epic concern of mine.   Im now thinking as you did Brad that the knock detection is likely due to the bearings giving a bit more noise as pressure dropped away. Kinkstah, drop your oil, and get a sample of it (as you're draining it) and send it off for analysis.
    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
×
×
  • Create New...