Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Just after some help with my current problem.

When I drive my car and go over 5000rpm the revs hold up. When its in gear it will hold the revs say at 4000rpm and when I engage the clutch it will redline. It does this for a few seconds then goes back to normal.

When this happened last I put my foot behind the pedal and it was all the way up.

I've checked if the throttle cable is jamming and I can't fault it when the car isn't moving.

Cleaned the AAC

Cleaned the throttle body

What else can I check? I'm lost at what it could be.

Mods are:

Greddy plenum

Hypertune throttle body

3037s

Injectors

Power fc

Z32

It had all this work even before the problem started. And sometimes it won't happen

Thanks for your help

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421902-rb25-problem/
Share on other sites

Possible TPS fault. If you can get a commander hooked up to the ECU, look for TPS voltage to drop to <0.5 V as you close the throttle.

Also you need to look for vacuum leaks and watch the ignition timing. If it is unusually high, that may cause a big rev too.

Thanks mate, ill check the tps

I don't think it would be a vacuum leak because it doesn't happen all the time

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421902-rb25-problem/#findComment-6787956
Share on other sites

I changed the tps and the problem is still occurring.

I took the throttle body off and it still looks good. Sat there for a while opening and closing it and never jammed.

While I was out testing the problem again I would dab the throttle when it was keeping the revs up and it would stop.

I'm going to have a look at where the throttle cable joins the pedal and see how I go.

Wish me luck

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421902-rb25-problem/#findComment-6791345
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...