Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

A mate of mine is selling is Nissan R31 Skyline Silhouette. Perfect car for turbo setup! Just bolt-on manifold!

Specs are below:

1989 Nissan R31 Skyline Silhouette

RB30

270,000 kms

Rego til 20/10/2004

Automatic

Extractors

Straight through cat

2.5" Exhaust

7" Cannon with 5" Tip

Lowered

1/200 rare Nissan GTS wheels (White)

Kenwood CD Player

Kenwood 6" 2-ways

Temp gauge

Immaculate inside & out...

Asking price:

$4200.00 (with standard wheels)

$6000.00 (with GTS wheels)

Number: 0415 178 280 (Alex)

Pics below:

P1050002.JPG

P1050003.JPG

P1050004.JPG

P1050005.JPG

P1050006.JPG

P1050007.JPG

P1050008.JPG

P1050009.JPG

P1050010.JPG

P1050011.JPG

P1050013.JPG

P1050015.JPG

P1050016.JPG

P1050019.JPG

P1050024.JPG

Cheers

Vince

Dude - it's a really nice car - but for other's out there , making it turbocharged is not as simple as just whacking on a new manifold and turbo. :)

actually it is... rb30et (vlturbo)

fair enough you need the ECU too but same with the later skylines

very nice 31 dude, low as shit and awsome paint. should get that price easy, especially with the gts2 wheels

mabye try chuck it on r31skylineclub.com

actually it is... rb30et (vlturbo)

fair enough you need the ECU too but same with the later skylines

Oh is it - OK - my bad.

I thought you would have had to decompress the engine, change loom and ECU, change inlet pipe work and exhaust flange. And I would have added an intercooler to do it properly :) Also thought VLTs had a stronger crank.

Good luck with the sale for your mate - its an awsome looking car. :P

LOL

ok my fault i didnt read his full post, thought you were just badmouthing the fact it wasnt turbo. didn't see that he qouted that first. :headspin:

crank and loom are the same and only need to change compression if you wanna run more than 12psi. ...exhaust flange is part of the manifold...

oh and ive never met him so dont insinuate that i'm sticking up for him cause i know him.

--end of hijack--

:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...