Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am getting a bit pissed off with a few teething problems I am having that I shouldnt be having.

I had a missfire the other day so I went to the place who did my car and gave them the 'WTF?' they played with injector plugs and it was fixed "oh yeh we had no clips to hold your plugs to your injectors you will have to get some" ... that didnt impress me because what if at full boost an injector plug gets loose? there goes my engine.... err WTF?

Now I was driving home last night and I got a missfire again, I pulled over and fiddled with the plugs and noticed under revs that a mist (looked like steam but i guess its fuel?) was coming from between the front injector and the block and there was some liquid there, it stunk of petrol.

When I first sent the car to the workshop I had put the plugs in (GTR injectors, RB20) but I didnt bed them in properly so they leaked and had to be redone, the workshop also told me while tuning an injector leaked and had to be redone again. NB. Redone = put back in with new o-ring.

I cant drive the car to the workshop as I am scared it will catch on fire.

My questions are:

1) The mist that looks like steam coming out of the injector would be fuel or steam ?

2) Anyone know the part number of the orings or if they are the same as RB30 ones so i can get some tomorrow.

3) will i need to replace all the o-rings or just one injector.

3) hints on the best way to replace and install the new oring(s)

Any other advice is welcomed.

Thanks in advance,

Evan

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42268-teething-problems/
Share on other sites

It's the o-ring. I had a split one (was crimped when putting in the injector) for about 2,000k's. Was dribbling fuel out the whole time, too lazy to change it.

With the top feed injectors you need to loosen the fuel rail (two bolts) and remove the offending injector to get to the o ring. You can do it yourself, although the workshop that's done all the work should replace it out of courtesy (hell they should have noticed it and fixed it when they had the car).

It's a bit of a pain the the ass with the standard intake manifold, as access is a bit restricted. There's nothing that hot on the intake side that would ignite the fuel, but having said that a spark from a loose earthing point could ignite it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42268-teething-problems/#findComment-864457
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...