Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dude there is definitely something seriously wrong with your car. It should not ping. Ever. The ECU is smart enough to prevent detonation and retard timing a long time before you can hear pinging. My V35 makes 183rwkw and I drive it like I stole it, and it NEVER pings. I have an ear for it (my R34 used to ping depending on boost and fuel used).

Get a mechanic to check it out asap - at least get it on a dyno to check your afrs.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423199-ping/page/2/#findComment-6813066
Share on other sites

I disagree. The ecu isn't that smart. You will hear the rattle a long time before the ecu drops into high det mode. In fact motors have been lost cause the ecu hasn't dropped into hi det.

Take your car to Nissan, and get them to plug it into consult. Your mechanics obd reader sounds shit. Ask them what the timing is set on, and if you can get them to check the ign timing is right. Should be 15 degrees at idle, at least that's for a DE. They can adjust static timing, and t might be worth getting them to reduce it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423199-ping/page/2/#findComment-6813104
Share on other sites

But how on earth would a 36k old engine be detonating? Like I said mine has been running 183rwkw and has now done 125,000km and I even drive it hard on the track and can't even hear it rattle EVER - it runs like a dream (admittedly I do have a bigger oil cooler, big alloy radiator and an oil cooler, but still). Let alone at low revs like the OP is stating.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423199-ping/page/2/#findComment-6813145
Share on other sites

While being very dubious about any import being 36k Kms old, I'll let it slide because Kms has nothing to do with knock. Ping is most likely to occur in the peak torque range of the motor. That's why when you look at an ign map, through the mid range timing advance decreases and gets returned higher in the rev range.

As I said. Too much ign advance and or poor quality fuels, or fuel starvation. It needs to be put on consult and read as to what it's actually doing. Even stock Ecus have static timing adjustment which means you could make it ping.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423199-ping/page/2/#findComment-6813150
Share on other sites

Have you changed the plugs recently?

I would have a guess and say you have a slightly blocked injector, or you're fuel pump is faulty. Have you changed the fuel pump?

If the intakes are leaking after the afm's it will cause it to run lean...

QFT.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423199-ping/page/2/#findComment-6813153
Share on other sites

Yeah, I was not sure how to adjust the timing of the ECU using the OBD 2 scanner. I was told I should be able to change certain values on the ECU using the OBD 2. Was using my uncle's one, he owns an auto shop. I didn't know how to so I left it alone. Might go back and try it out later on again.

And yea my mechanic works at Nissan, am trying to book my car in so he can do it. I only went and test it out myself cause I couldnt get a hold of him as yet. And since my uncle has the tools I thought I'd give it a go :) too bad he doesn't have Consult III, he has the universal one for different car brands. Was quite impressed it worked on the V. Then again for the amount of $ he spent on it, it should have worked.

Edited by colin.ssc
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423199-ping/page/2/#findComment-6813467
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...