Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Those that saw my earlier post (Exhausts: noise ='s power) may remember my fuel pump/pressure and leaning out dramas from last weekends dyno session?

Well it turns out I had neither an 044 or 984 Bosch pump! It was the little baby of the Bosch range... the 910. It put up a good effort considering the demand that's been placed on it! I found the box that my pump "supposedly" came out of. It had 984 on it.

The 910 will go to a new home (Shaun's RX7 turbo circuit car - coming soon!) and I now have an 044. I watched it go in, so this time I'm 100% sure I have an 044 :)

After a bit of fuel pressure adjustment, some tuning to suit the new pump and f/pressure, and it was time to see what power it could muster? Shaun richened up the mixtures across the rev range (to keep it nice and safe). Peak torque A/FR is low/mid 11's and top end is 11.8.

Even with the richer mixtures we still made a number of high 290rwkw runs, with a best of 299.1rwkw (401rwhp) It made 298-299 back to back :) I was happy with that so we didn't bother with the magical 300. It was worth stopping short of 300 just to see many people are going to go, "ahhh c'mon just a bit more boost and you would've had it" :( LOL Shaun, Wayne, Craig (MAD DAT Motorsport) and myself crowded around the dyno screen and all went OHHHHH! when it flashed up 299.1. If it had've been 299.9 then I would've been pissed :)

Boost was at ~1.5bar (~22psi)

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks Jay :)

Yeah we've been around a while us old timers :) Back in the days when a 200rwkw GTS25t was a big achievement! I won my first ever dyno comp at CAS (now CRD) with a 200+rwkw run. That was ~1999-2000 I think?

These days my power figure isn't much to brag about at all. Look at all these big power monsters on our forums! There's about 6-7 300+rwkw GTS25t at least. Then you've got Adrian (2rismo), Brett (Buster), Chris (Doughboy), GOTBOOST and more that are into the low 12's and 11's!

I'm hoping to run the car at AIR on Sunday (6th) With the Nittos, me getting my shit together, no breakages (PLEASE! - touch wood, metal, plastic and anything else I can get my hands on!!!) I'd love to see a very low 12, high 11 and 120+mph.

Congrats Matt! Look forward to watching ur beast down the track! Ill have my camera there, so put on a good show! ;)

Thanks Mark ;) I'll give it my best shot mate. As long as I drive it home in one piece I'll be happy.

Thanks all :)

Brendan, we thought about dropping the exhaust. I wanted to see how much difference it'd make? But we ran out of time.

Matty - 'Slammed Mobile Guard Rolling' Jeff Hughes 0401 400 005 He is only too happy to travel to wherever you want. As long as he has access to 240V ( to power his heat gun) you can get it done while you're at work. Just make sure your wheel nuts are tight when he's finished :) It shouldn't cost you more than $110 for the rear.

I'm keen to head out there at gates open time if you are Matt? 9am or 10am... it's all good to me.

Bl4ck32,

With your new combo you'll do more than just pass me! How long till we get to see the full power of your beast unleashed?

Thanks Mel :) You could always bring your Nan? I'll could give her a special 'birthday' ride in the car :D

Thats very nice to gain power aswell as richening up the mixtures for saftey! Did Shaun add any timing anywhere on the map?

I'm 99% sure no additional timing was added.

The peak power is mostly unchanged from the other day (~2rwkw). Cooler inlet temps may well have gained the extra rwkw. To be totally honest such a small amount is just as likely to come from tyre to roller diferences, or 0.5psi boost increase. It may have been 22.5 to 22.9psi whereas the other day is was 22.0psi? It all adds up.

The A/FR at peak power has not changed much at all (~0.2) It's peak torque and especially the top end A/FRs that are much safer (11.8 as opposed to 13.0!!!)

The real test will be on the drag strip.

Very nice. It's funny how long these things can take, but you've has a lot of ups and downs with your car for so long. With the same fundamental mechanical package it's gone from 180 to ~300. It's good to have that development and optimisation over time.

BTW....GO THE GARRETT/MICROTECH LEGENDS VS THE TWO LOCAL HKS/POWER FC SLY AND DIRTY ENEMY! The war continues :rofl:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...