Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

tumblr_m7w91lO74L1ql7erzo1_1280.jpg

Yay, nay or gay? I like it, because skylines have better front ends where as supras have better rear ends, so here u get the best of both, would u call it the Skypra or Supraline?

Edited by discoPumpkin

I actually find this thread very surprising.

When I was looking for my second car (still on my P plates) I test drove a N/A R34 and N/A Supra. I ended up going with the N/A Supra because it felt a lot quicker and the dash was a lot more inviting. I love the 34 and Supra looks pretty equally.

I am now a few years on and looking at trading up to a 34 GTR at some point, because the Supra is such a broad minded person to handle in the rain and AWD is rather inviting - but its very surprising to hear a Skyline forum telling people to get a supra. After all, the only comments I've ever got from skyline drivers is "Go f*ck off fishing in your boat"

2JZ is an amazing engine, the V161 and V160 Getrag 6 speeds are amazing. The stock internals don't need to be switched until big numbers. After being in a 600HP GT42R big single supra, its incredible. BUT, the car felt utterly uncontrollable as soon as you came on boost (you are just along for the ride), especially in the rain. After driving my N/A Supra for long enough in the rain, I get the feeling that she actually wants to kill me.

I actually find this thread very surprising. 

 

When I was looking for my second car (still on my P plates) I test drove a N/A R34 and N/A Supra. I ended up going with the N/A Supra because it felt a lot quicker and the dash was a lot more inviting. I love the 34 and Supra looks pretty equally.

 

I am now a few years on and looking at trading up to a 34 GTR at some point, because the Supra is such a broad minded person to handle in the rain and AWD is rather inviting - but its very surprising to hear a Skyline forum telling people to get a supra. After all, the only comments I've ever got from skyline drivers is "Go f*ck off fishing in your boat" 

 

2JZ is an amazing engine, the V161 and V160 Getrag 6 speeds are amazing. The stock internals don't need to be switched until big numbers. After being in a 600HP GT42R big single supra, its incredible. BUT, the car felt utterly uncontrollable as soon as you came on boost (you are just along for the ride), especially in the rain. After driving my N/A Supra for long enough in the rain, I get the feeling that she actually wants to kill me. 

Well put.

I think if you want a car that can make passengers spontaneously shit themselves when you come on boost or like the adrenalin of "superman-ride" acceleration, then you look at the supra.

If you want a good all round bang for your buck sports car which is quite agile and can still be quite powerful as a street car, get the skyline.

If that's not agile enough, look at an evo/sti.

I'm not really mentioning them in the same sentence, unless you favour cornering and absolute agility above all else. I still say pick skyline or supra depending on what you want, unless it's not exactly what either car offers.

The r34 gtr is not in the same league as later model Lancer Evo and WRX Sti's for cornering speed (while obviously still having more in a straight line and power potential). Watch best motoring Tsukuba battles (tight track favouring nimble cars) and the 4 cylinders started beating gtrs from about evo 7 onwards.

Hmmm, Interesting. I don't recall seeing any videos of GTR vs Evo/STI on Tsukuba - I'll have a hunt tonight.

GTR seems to be the nice middle ground between Supra and Evo then :P I personally prefer mountain runs than straight line, and live at the bottom of one with some nice hairpins that I frequent.

if i'm not wrong...there was a clip showing the BNR34 (tsuchiiya) vs Rx7 (orido) in a tight mountain pass kinda terrain and the GTR lost but in the tsukuba circuit...they had BNR34 vs BNR33 vs BNR32 vs STI vs Evo and the R34 came out tops :)

The problem with the touges in Japan is that they are all downhill, so if the cars are lighter and are well sorted rwd they tend to go better because they hardly under steer. But the gtr and other awd cars understeer hence are at a disadvantage but if you throw in some uphills and on the track of course they get slaughtered.

Aristo about as quick as a Supra?

Since when did the Aristo have as much success as the Supra did in JGTC ??? Oh wait it didn't even race in such a series.

And Supra has an amaziiiiiinggg interior, feels like you're in a jet fighter plane. Totally awesome.

"This is a CEFIRO!!!" (Tsuchiya negatively describing the performance of the V35 Skyline)

Come on now, admit it, the aristo was almost as good as the two tone S13 driven by the DK.

Seriously though, the Aristo isnt that much slower (****IN A STRAIGHT LINE****) than the Supra.

If you have high expectations expecting an interior from a jap import who made the interior cheap and tacky on purpose to keep costs low; you're gonna have a bad time. want a fancy interior and lots of space? get a toyota aristo :) same motor as the supra and just about as quick. Honestly you get a stupid amount of car for the price of them.

 

Aristo about as quick as a Supra?

 

Since when did the Aristo have as much success as the Supra did in JGTC ??? Oh wait it didn't even race in such a series.

And Supra has an amaziiiiiinggg interior, feels like you're in a jet fighter plane. Totally awesome.

 

thanks for everyone help, I actually went a different way and brought a v35. 

 

"This is a CEFIRO!!!" (Tsuchiya negatively describing the performance of the V35 Skyline)

I'd forgotten that how a highly modified race car performed reflected onto how 2 road going cars compare. Thanks for the reminder.....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks for that, I'll check it all out. I can always do the brakes last anyway if its a problem.  The 16's are super cool, if they do fit I'll cruise around with them for a bit.  
    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
×
×
  • Create New...