Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yesterday I installed my new tension arms, lower brace, steering rod ends and coilovers ( all japspeed). Fitting was easy, but I'm running into problems aligning everything. I've adjusted the tension arms so the wheel is exactly centered in the arch (a few degrees positive), and trying to adjust toeing now. Strange thing is that the wheels are still facing inwards a bit, but I can't shorten the steering rods any further.. if I push the wheels back with the tension rods, it gets better, but that makes the caster go negative..is there a different way to affect the front toe?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/427119-r33-gtst-toe-alignment-issues/
Share on other sites

Can't see whats wrong there, it's fitted correctly and the rods should be the correct ones according to japspeed.

20130617_065956_zpsddb676db.jpg

What I'm going to try tonight is raise the car a cm and push the wheels back a bit.
The car used to stand like this:
292363_481995421880150_117211904_n.jpg
Looks like it definately had negative caster, but it's hard to know for sure. Does anybody know the dimensions it's supposed to have horizontally from the center of the wheel to the front and to the rear of the arch?

Edited by sstennizz

10mm longer, so I compensated that on the tread of the rod, .. but then still had to add the rest of the tread.. So it's not really the end that's the problem.
And about the rack ends, what I don't understand is why they'd sell the rod ends if you end up needing different rack ends as well?

My guess is that it has to do with the caster. I'm starting to think the wheel isn't supposed to be dead center in the arch. But slightly to the rear. Though haven't got anything to compare it with. Images I find on google of side views show the wheel damn near dead center, but might be heavily modified..

Have you actually measured caster, or are you just guessing that fore-aft movement results in a certain amount of +/- caster? For one thing, your car may have been owned and driven by a 6-toed moron who liked to crash it into kerbs and the front crossmember might have been moved on it's chassis rail bolts. That can cause the wheels to be fore or aft of where they're supposed to be.

True. I'm going to check the angle today, see where it is exactly. My guess is that is just has to move back a bit. We did some measuring and a degree in caster is barely visible without measuring. We'll see. Planning to have her aligned next wednesday. First have to mount the hicas lockout bar. Better get front and rear done at the same time, instead of having to go twice.. ;)

Things I know for sure:
My front caster is damn near 0 degrees
20130617_163036_zps9087448f.jpg
Pushing it back makes it go negative and improves the toe angle, pulling it forward towards the required 6.4 degrees makes it toe in even more.

My wheels are clearly visibly toeing in
20130617_163416_zps539b141a.jpg

There is some cambering
20130617_163359_zps59b05d6b.jpg

There is no more adjusting left on the steering rod ends
20130617_065956_zpsddb676db.jpg
20130617_163319_zpsc4108acb.jpg
20130617_163202_zpsf72e8af6.jpg

What can the alignment shop do that I'm not seeing right now? I thought negative caster was bad for driveability, but that seems to be the only way to get it done. And now at least I know for sure that the previous owner(s) where driving with a buttload of negative caster, since the wheel was pulled back at least a couple of cm's on the old short springs and shocks.

Could be they fitted the wrong tie rods somewhere in the past and decided to counter act that by giving it negative caster? As I understand some other series use the same thread just different lengths?
I don't think the subframe is out of position, since the bolts are exactly where they are supposed to be. Anyone know the standard length of a R33 track rod? I know the new ends are 15mm longer, but on the old setup (with the negative caster) that still gave me plenty thread to realign. On the right caster though i can never get it aligned. What I'm going to try today is lift the car up about a cm and pull the wheels a little more towards that 6 degrees. The caster right now isn't enough yet to pull the wheels straight again. When cornering now I really need to turn them straight myself, otherwise I'll end up on the side of the road.. I was thinking about adding some thread to the stock ones, even though there's not much left on the rod to put thread on and shortening them a couple of cm's.
Japspeed is now trying to get me to buy their track rods as well.. Which I didn't intent to.. Why sell rod ends if you end up needing the rods too??

My guess it that somebody fitted the wrong length tie rods and to compensate for length difference, they pushed back the caster.
What I did::
- Old tie rod / end measured how much thread was left.
- Removed old end
- Measured old and new ends (new one 15mm longer) which gave me approx 15mm free space on the thread.
- Replaced Struts / tension rods (about 10mm lower than before).
- Caster to just positive (should actually be around 6 degrees, but thats for the alignment shop, as long as it's not negative)
- Fitted the new ends and adjusted so that it compensated the length difference

- Toe-in... A lot..
- Tried adjusting the tie rods, but dead end.. And still toe-in..
If i now press the caster backwards, it actually decreases the toe-in and actually starts pulling the rear of the wheel inwards, but also makes the caster go negative.

Subframe is not moved or bent (deviation is identical on both sides and subframe is still neatly on the mounting bolts), and I can't find any bent rods or arms (would be a huge coincidence that both sides are equally crooked).
On soc they just state that I should have bought the tie rods as well, because it won't work with standard tie rods (why the hell to they sell just the ends without mentioning it then?).
I now have a few options. Buy the tie rods from japspeed and hope I can get them shorter, shorten the ones I have now and lengthen the thread on them, or shorten the new ends which then makes them a lot less reliable.

Does anyone happen to have a loose R33 tie rod, to measure the length from the rack to the end?

S14/R33 ones are 290mm

the issue here is the rods on the rack not the caster, people even run 10degress of caster ( say 6 more then "center" ...)

rack ends might be from another car or lock spacer, so too long and of course i'd assume that the rod ends are adjusted all the way, make sure the rubber boot isn't hiding some more thread on it

i think cefiro rack ends are m14 and are the same length as the s13 with is shorter so if all else fails give that a go

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...