Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I really want to run a forward facing (not even for the performance gain, but for the fact that changing plugs and setting timing become a harder task with the piping running it's current course).
Just wondering who has used what plenum? and a link to purchase.
Pro's and cons of said plenum?
What you've had to move in the engine bay to run the plenum?
Have you had to modify the plenum itself to fit?
If the throttle cable didn't reach, which cable did you use?
Did the tps wiring reach or did it need extending?

Any other valuable information is appreciated.

Cheers, Cameron.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428716-rb20det-forward-facing-plenum/
Share on other sites

I agree with the comment above... in most cases going for a front facing plenum is going to be a performance loss, not a gain. This is due to the shorter runner length robbing you of torque low in the rev range. Due to the smaller capacity this will be very apparent with the RB20 engine and make it a pig for day to day driving.

You can get cheap copies of the Plazmaman style plenum top on eBay, this will retain your lower runners which is probably the best compromise.

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/All-New-POLISHED-Nissan-R32-Skyline-RB20DET-RB20-GTS-Intake-Manifold-Plenum-/121040978566?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item1c2e9ac286

Keep the stock one, unless you just want your bay to look 'neater'

I was going to get the plazmaman rb20 plenum, but after reading a lot of info about these going onto rb20det it's a loss in power.

Also supposably it bolts straight on BUT other things will get in the way, battery ect.

So I'm sticking with stock, good for 270kw or more. An rb20 probably won't see much more than that anyway..

This was one of the plenums that caught my eye as it looks relatively standard to someone (ie: a cop) who doesn't know much about plenums and would only be looking for shiny chrome.

Anyone on here used it and has some feedback?

I simply wouldn't do this to any RB engine unless I was putting a high mount turbo on and there was simply no hope of keeping the inlet pipe running across the engine toward the turbo. All other reasons (appearance, accessibility of coils/plugs) are insufficient for the compromises and arse pain involved.

I simply wouldn't do this to any RB engine unless I was putting a high mount turbo on and there was simply no hope of keeping the inlet pipe running across the engine toward the turbo. All other reasons (appearance, accessibility of coils/plugs) are insufficient for the compromises and arse pain involved.

I have a t04e high mount using a stock plenum.. Still not changing though.. :) ..the plenum that is.

My t04e can get farrrrked

Edited by Zrobe

The use of the word "and" in my post is required to understand the meaning of it. The necessary conditions would be highmount AND inability to keep the crossover pipe clear.

lol relax man

I've actually ordered a plazmaman plenum for mine to simply clean up the engine bay and make everything easier to get to, I'm just waiting for it to turn up. So far I'll have to extend the tps wires and I'm not too sure what I'm going to do with the coolant pipes yet but I'll let you know how I go.

Just do it like the pic that johnnilicte posted. All the money you will spend on this could go to another turbo, or tune, or injectors, or guages or anything else you want. You will spend the money then regret it like i did on my RB25 when i bought a china front mount and all i had was issues, and for what? Nothing.

That's definitely going to be plan B, but it's only solving one problem..

I'm still going to do more research until I can completely rule out a forward facing, then I will retreat to Plan B.

I make money to spend it, and it's not really that much. I see it as more of a gain than a waste so I'm happy to justify a few hundred on a new plenum if it makes my life easier down the track.

Also, I don't want another turbo or any other mods to this engine along those lines. I'm keeping the car the way it is (to a certain extent) so I can enter it in the AS class for nationals and still have a car that's happy to be street driven. My extra cash goes into the track car which is where I want the power.

It's not a gain. It is a waste. And no, there are no options for bolting anything onto the standard runners that are as good as the standard plenum. Those options are only the least worst.

Big FFPs are for motors making massive power that need a big increase in plenum volume (and a suitable increase in TB size and so on). There's no need at all at anything up to quite unstreetable power levels.

Edited by GTSBoy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...