Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I'm undergoing well almost finished building my full house rb26, I'm thinking of a single turbo kit and really interested in the precision range turbos, I was looking into the 6766 ball bearing turbo, anyone using these on their rb26 and what feedback I can get regarding it, also where is best site I can purchase this from

Thanks alot guys cheers

FP HTA SUPER 94. My opinion.

Maybe ask this in the precision turbo thread? That is what it's there for. Then when others want to search for a similar topic to yours there is bnot 71 different off shoots about Precision turbos. Pm "Lithium" and ask him what he recommends in the Forced Perfornance HTA RANGE. in particular the super 94. Would be similar to a 6766 but better I think.

Josh.

  • Like 1

This question is difficult to answer without being told what expectations are. 33GTRV is fairly on the money from what I've seen, if you want silly power and retain response a bit closer to typical midrange turbos (GT3582R->T04Z of the old generation) then the 6466 is probably good for that kind of thing.

If you are aiming at getting SERIOUS and thinking more about T51R type power but with lag closer to a run of the mill T04Z then I'd skip the 6766 and go straight to an 94HTA based turbo. While neither the Precision or FP crowds release maps if I were a betting man I'd say that if mapped - the 94HTA would provide a much wider map, as opposed to a taller (read: needs more boost for big power) map like the 6766.

This wouldn't be conventional thinking, but if it's a stock stroke RB26 then the .85 T3 Super94 HTA may sound like a weird suggestion (ie, mid-a/r T3 for a big power RB26?) might be the gun thing, they have proven to make BIG power and are a very solid turbo - also not hugely expensive for what they are and this turbo has been proven to work VERY well on a serious spec 4G63, which seem (exhaust side) to have a similar sweet spot to a stock stroke RB26 imho.... they just prefer more compressor vs pressure ratio. I would call this turbo capable of well over 600awkw on a suitably build RB26 on E85/race fuel and respectable response for the madness it is capable of: http://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=FP&Product_Code=NTFPSUPER94&Category_Code=SP. I'd confirm with FP, and also check with them if there actually are other exhaust housing options for it if you would prefer something else.

The GT3794R-HTA is more expensive, though a very reasonable alternative - makes a bit less power than a Super94 HTA though also spools slightly better, and has more turbine housing options and again I believe better suited to a very high flowing 6cyl than the Precision alternative:

http://store.forcedperformance.net/PROD/NTGT3794HTA.html

I have the impression GTPumps.com.au are suppliers for ForcedPerformance turbos, otherwise they can be ordered at the links I provided above - which is how 34GeeTeeTee got his GT3076R-HTA (check the thread out here: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/426059-forced-performance-hta-turbos/)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
×
×
  • Create New...