Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi USRB25S13 , "Over boost protection" is what it is know as, but it is really "excessive airflow protection". The ecu makes this decision based on what the AFM is telling it. So boost really has nothing to do with it. The fix is an SAFC, voltage clamp, Boost Cut Defeater or better still replace the std ecu with a Power FC. Full fuel cut is the next step in engine protection programming in the ECU, but you get "retard" and "rich" first.

Here is a post I prepared earlier that may help

................................................................................

......................

Hi guys, a quick, simplistic explanation of how an SAFC works might help...

As the airflow into the engine increase, the AFM records this as increased voltage that the ECU sees. What an SAFC does is sit in between the AFM and the ECU and take the voltages from the AFM and either increase or decrease them depending on what you have programmed the SAFC to do. By increasing the voltage, this tricks the ecu into pumping in more fuel, you do this when the engine is running lean. By decreasing the voltage, this tricks the ecu into pumping in less fuel, you do this when the engine is running rich.

The next bit is hard to understand unless you remember that the standard ecu does not supply fuel in direct proportion to the afm voltage ie; 4 volts is not twice as much fuel as 2 volts. Engine rpm, boost and throttle position also help the ecu determine how much fuel to add.

It has been my experience that RB25's run a little lean down low in the rpm range (Nissan do this for fuel economy and emissions) and a lot rich up high (Nissan do this to protect the engine). So I have to increase the voltage (using the SAFC) up to around 3,000 rpm and decrease the voltage over 5,000 rpm.

The real problem is in the 3,000 to 5,000 rpm range as the engine comes on boost. They really need lots of fuel very quickly in this area. This can mean that you need to increase the voltage (that the ecu sees) over 5.1 volts to get the right A/F ratios. The ecu then goes into engine protection mode, rich and retarded (sounds like a girl I knew once). Past that rpm you can start leaning it out as it runs too rich, so the voltage needs to be turned down under 5.1 volts. The ecu sees this as the engine not needing protection mode any more, no more rich and retarded.

So you get good performance up to 3,000 rpm, then sluggish from 3,000 rpm to 5,000 rpm and then good performance from 5,000 rpm and over. The SAFC may not help this, in fact as explained above, it can in fact make it worse if the tuner is not switched on to this stuff.

With bent afm voltages, the ecu (tricked by the SAFC) also fires the ignition to suite the airflow it THINKS the engine is getting. This is not a good thing as you generally end up with ignition that is too far advanced in some rpm ranges.

The poor tuner has to juggle the SAFC settings, so that the A/F ratios are OK, the ecu doesn't get into rich and retard (engine protection) mode and the ignition timing is not too far advanced so as to cause detonation. My experience (I am not a good tuner) has been that this is full of compromises, sometimes you just can't win and have to reduce the boost level a bit to get even a reasonable compromise.

Keep in mind that this explanation is very simplified to make it fit in a reasonable space, the rpm's used are rough guides only and every car is different.

Hope it helps (and makes some sense).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43180-fuel-cut-defender/#findComment-882968
Share on other sites

the ecu will retard too much at 17psi. there will be too much airflow and the timing will get retarded heaps. i would seriously look at an getting an aftermarket ecu before even considering 17psi. youll get much more bang per $ if you had an aftermarket ecu and 15psi vs stock ecu and 17psi

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43180-fuel-cut-defender/#findComment-883633
Share on other sites

What kinda Timing adjustments can you make with the PFC? The main problem I have here in the US is finding one. I either have to take my chance on ebay or find a good source some where (wink wink) to sell me one. I may just get a standalone (Haltech or Tech III) for they may be cheaper/easier to get.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43180-fuel-cut-defender/#findComment-884585
Share on other sites

Looks like a Power FC should be on the top of my future mods list.....Can you still have a boost cut with the power FC? Just for overboost protection.

Firstly you tune it properly for your boost level. You can of course tune it for more boost than you run via the boost table. In other words tune it "normally" with optimium A/F ratios and ignition timing. Or you can add extra fuel and/or retard the timing if the boost goes above your target. You can make this a "saftey net" (only a bit richer and a bit retarded) or "protection" (dump heaps of fuel and lots of retard). "Protection" is like the standard ECU. The standard ECU then has full on fuel cut off, Power FC doesn't have that for obvious reasons.

What kinda Timing adjustments can you make with the PFC?

Whatever you want, there is no limit to the ignition mapping as long as you stay within 20 X 20 load points. Plus you have correction tables for temperature and boost.

The main problem I have here in the US is finding one.

Try www.nengun.com they sell to anyone, anywhere at good prices. I have bought plenty of stuff from them, not one problem.

Hope that helps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43180-fuel-cut-defender/#findComment-884641
Share on other sites

QUOTE ()
What abot putting s chip in, could that do it?

There are limits as to what you can do with the standard ECU, but yep it would work. But you have an R33, they are extremely tricky (ie; expensive) to chip.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43180-fuel-cut-defender/#findComment-889781
Share on other sites

QUOTE ()
how much do u reckon im lookin at? after this im done no more money to the engine, unless it has to be done, and things always need to be done :)

Pretty much cheaper to buy and tune a Power FC and get it over and done with.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43180-fuel-cut-defender/#findComment-890257
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
    • I don't get in here much anymore but I can help you with this.   The hole is a vent (air relief) for the brake proportioning valve, which is built into the master cylinder.    The bad news is that if brake fluid is leaking from that hole then it's getting past the proportioning valve seals.   The really bad news is that no spare parts are available for the proportioning valve either from Nissan or after market.     It's a bit of a PITA getting the proportioning valve out of the master cylinder body anyway but, fortunately, leaks from that area are rare in my experience. BTW, if those are copper (as such) brake lines you should get rid of them.    Bundy (steel) tube is a far better choice (and legal  in Australia - if that's where you are).
×
×
  • Create New...