Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Got my diff back from sydney via couriers.

It seems to be damaged. See that bit is bent back.

post-89755-0-52728100-1381780200_thumb.jpgpost-89755-0-51295600-1381780178_thumb.jpgpost-89755-0-05783200-1381780217_thumb.jpg

Theres a new Kaaz 2 way in there with no oil yet.

Would a hit big enough to do that, damage the centre too?

If i bolt a driveshaft to that it will be bad, right?

Im very dissapointed, a diff was something ive saved $ for, for a while now and it looks broken already.

Canberra Centenary Hillclimb this weekend, wont be able to enter now.

But mainly the $1900 i just spent.

:rant:

Make sure you have insurance on the couriers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433362-is-this-stuffed-damaged-in-transit/
Share on other sites

Could it have been damaged in transit, possibly. What's more likely, is that it was damaged when the person assembling the diff was installing the half shafts. They require a decent hit to get them past the circlip. Having said that, is it a big deal? I don't think so. It doesn't look too bad, and I think it will pull straight once bolted up.

I don't think a hit that big would be enough force to transfer into the diff itself and do damage, but I also don't think bolting up a drive shaft is a great idea either. I may be off on this, but I wonder If you could remove that bent outdrive and take it to an engineer to be straightened and annealed to reduce the internal stresses.

That sucks mate, but the LSD will be fine. If you know someone with a dial indicator, set it up against the flange face and rotate the shaft with the indicator against the flange that's taken the hit (I know one of the ears is bent but it's to see if the actual flange is out of alignment with the shaft, so set the dial indicator in towards the centre a little). You shouldn't see too much runout, otherwise the shaft/flange is out of alignment. 0.1mm (.004") would be a ballpark limit. If you've got a spare half shaft or can find one, just put that in.

I doubt that would have been caused by knocking the half shafts back in, probably dropped in transit.

Being cast, you run the risk of cracking the flange if you straighten it. If you do decide to straighten it, make sure you crack test it afterwards. Alternatively, replace the half shaft to be on the safe side.

Trying to bolt a half shaft onto that might not straighten it, and if so, will then subject that bolt to fatigue loading. Bolted joins rely on a good contact surface between the 2 components. A slight gap (and misalignment) will lead to broken bolts through fatigue and uneven loading under the bolt head.

As others have said, I think that the diff centre is protected from thrust loading from the half shafts, so that shouldn't have damaged the diff centre.

Certainly does suck though - hard to get good help these days

Thanks guys.

the shop rang and he said take it out and try to hammer it flat again, carefully.

It works 90% of the time.... apparently.

Ill give it a go, if it doesnt work....... new shaft.

Thanks guys.

the shop rang and he said take it out and try to hammer it flat again, carefully.

It works 90% of the time.... apparently.

Ill give it a go, if it doesnt work....... new shaft.

Mine was the same when a mate shimmed my old diff... The bolts will pull it flat of you double up the spanners ;)

well that sucks. I reckon it would take a decent hit to bend that. My guess is it had something heavy on it or dropped during transit. Unless you can see a crack on the diff housing I would not worry about any other damage other than the easily replaced halfshaft. Just count the splines on the half shaft, they do vary. Or maybe award can send you one as a goodwill gesture.....

All fixed now.

Picked up a shaft from a local import wrecker.

By the way Duncan, i owe you one for sure, you took it down for nothing, and the freight company charged a fee for being late, not actually delivering it to me, and damaging it.

So tell us when your down this way so i can buy you a case of beers or something. :thumbsup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...