Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So i was wanting more boost and so i recently purchased a boost controller and boost gauge.

I fitted them both using the forums as a guide but there seemed to be a problem i set the boost controller to half turn when installed thinking i would see a increase in boost over stock but i didn't so i kept turning up the dial on the controller over a few days until the top of it came off and the whole time the gauge never showed more then 6psi.

So i triple checked all the tubes but finally took the boost controller apart and when i blew into it seems to leak air through where the dial adjuster is so i decided to revert it all back to stock i had kept all the stock tubing.

I was interested to see what the boost gauge would show on stock solenoid and instantly was hit with 10 psi and car was pulling how i wanted it to with the after market boost controller??

It defiantly wasn't running 10 psi before i put on and then took off controller. now i have no idea how it could be running at 10psi any one have a idea?

ive attach a pic of how i connect boost controller before i took it out.

post-128131-0-70931200-1385462000_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/435562-please-explain-free-boost/
Share on other sites

you said you intalled both the controller and gauge, are you sure you werent running around 10psi before the gauge intall?

i mean did you install gauge, drive it to see what it was reading then try the controller?

with a fmic and full exhaust my car hits about 10psi then drops to 9psi

Hey Tim.

If you installed your manual boost controller as per the pic, then I'm not surprised it didn't work. By looking at the picture, there seems to be a piece missing.

Which forum guide did you use for the boost controller?

I'd had purchased one of these about 8 months ago:

http://e4eonline.com/VUL_MOT/NEW_BC/KIT_400.jpg

You seem to be missing the Tee from your install (by the way the controller is setup in the pic).

I didn't like the manual set up, as I found there was not alot of control when cruising if I wanted to put my foot down . Boost spike was a real issue, & I hit fuel cut twice.

I then bought one of these & have NEVER looked back:

https://www.gfb.com.au/products/boost-controllers/g-force-ii-electronic-boost-controller-by-gfb

I bought it off EBAY for about $280 from MRT Performance.

Fantastic, set & forget......

The install was pretty straight forward too.

I know the Jap ones are really good, but i cannot justify spending $700+ for a daily commute.

Check out the first link I put up. You'll see a small 3 way Tee. That has the ball & spring 'in built'. The ball & spring are on the wastegate side of the Tee (hence the arrow indicating the direction of boost pressure travel). The controller is essentially a gate that bleeds a pre-determined (by how much the adjuster is turned) amount of boost off, BEFORE boost pressure overcomes spring tension & the ball lifts off it's seat to allow pressure to the wastegate.

If you do not have the Tee fitted, it ain't going to work (as per OP picture).

The boost TEE is missing from the picture. I dont know if you can get those controllers with the ball 'in built' with the gate, I doubt it.

The manual set up I bought came with a note, telling me to ignore the arrow, as It had been incorrectly printed. Quality.

A quick blow into the Tee will tell you which way to install it.

Anyway, those gated boost controllers are pretty crap. A better boost controller/bleeder is the old way to do it if you want more boost on a budget.

Go & buy afew different sized T-fittings, experiment by trial & error, drill 'em out till you get where you need to be, with little boost spike! LOL :whistling:

Hi gavin

Thanks for all the info and help. looks like i have the exact style controller in pic you posted so i did have the t piece but didn't think i needed to use it. i used this link as a guide.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/185848-installing-a-manual-boost-controller/?hl=+installing%20+manual%20+boost

Ill try fiiting it again with the t piece but at the momment my boost gauge is reading 10psi. ive connected the gauge tube to the plenum shown in picture is this a good spot for a accurate reading?

http://postimg.org/image/a0beibky3/

James- im pretty sure i connected the tube from the waste gate which is the left tube into the controller which has the arrow saying to wastegate it looks like this http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p215/srhim214/RB25wastegate.jpg

Hey Tim,

Yes you do need to use the supplied Tee piece!

That first guide looks like it for an R33.

Follow the install guide for the boost controller & you should be right.

The position for the gauge is perfect.

As for why you have 10psi now, you might have a leak somewhere through your refitment of the factory setup.

My strong advice is to save up & buy an electronic boost controller. Its the best protection for a stock engine running close to the fuel cut without a fuel cut defender!!!!

So i found this diagram http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j141/rustyshackleferd/boostcontroller.jpg

and installed it exactly like that and took it for a spin and it boosted to 20 psi straight away with controller only on half a turn so i just put it all back to stock again check all the hoses and clamps trimmed a bit off the worn hoses to make sure theres no leaks went for a drive and it is still hitting 10 psi so if its not doing any harm im pretty happy just to leave it how it is but really want to know why its at 10psi unless i connected a hose up wrong?

ROFL! Yeah, they are a bitch!!!!

Remember Trial & Error.

OK, as for the 10psi, it's most likely a hose/fitting issue. Worst case, maybe the wastegate diaphragm wasn't happy with it.

I'd recommend sussing out the cause, just so you know in case of any further arising issues.

or start step by step elimination. run hose straight from intercooler piping to wastegate., see what minimum boost is there. a r32 actuator will give you about 10psi so maybe you have that installed? or maybe the one you have is faulty, have seen one on a r33 (should be about 5psi) running at 9psi...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...