Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I bought my r34 gt-t 5 months ago, second day i owned it i spun it out into a couple (5) plastic posts and luckily only did panel damage. Anyway after that i wondered why tcs hadn't kicked in, the car just lost traction and away i went. I checked the fuses and surprise surprise Mr Tokyo Drift (previous jap owner) had pulled the tcs fuse and the dodgy as hell importer just pulled the dash globe for the tcs warning light. i replaced the fuse and globe and all was sweet. fast forward a month ago i pull my throttle body off so i can replace the rocker cover gaskets as it is leaking a fair bit of oil past them, put everything back in and know my tcs no longer works and the tcs light is always on. Does anyone know what i did wrong?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/438694-r34-tcs-not-functioning/
Share on other sites

TCS module is the one in front of the throttle body (R34 has 2 throttle bodies, the first one the air flows through is electronically actuated by TCS the second one is mechanically activated by the accelerator pedal.

TCS module has two plugs, one on the "front" of the TCS module and one on the "back" of the TCS module (back means nearest the firewall). You need both. The rear plug on mine has loose pins that slip out if you move the plug so double check your connections.

Why do you care? I always turn it off, not mashing the throttle is easily achievable.

The way the tcs cuts in is so harsh its ridiculous.

Anyway, check you have all the plugs on the throttle bidy and tcs throttle body plugged in correctly.

Was told the same by donovan from forced motorworx today, Will have to check the wiring and the pins for damage/looseness(is that even a word?)

Also the car has sustained $1500 in panel damage with the tcs off so i would rather it being on.

There are 3 things you need to know when you start driving a Skyline (I'm guessing nobody told you these very important rules):

1) Don't accelerate around corners

2) Don't accelerate around corners

3) Don't accelerate around corners

Don't blame the lack of TCS. Blame your right foot. Second day of owning a new car and "relying" on TCS is foolhardy. That's the nicest way I could possibly put it.

Also, do an advanced driver training day. Can't recommend them highly enough.

When i changed my rocker cover seals, the throttle body had to be removed. If you dont use the right gasket or if theres a leak in between when reinstalling, your tps will throw an error and your car will run like crap. Your tcs light will remain on too.

Hope this helps.

I ordered a new Gasket from taarks (genuine nissan metal gasket) when i did mine and hasnt leaked since. The stock paper gaskets are so brittle and shouldnt really be reused imo

Especially since i am running a new stock nissan gasket, Anyone have any ideas? It's is still showing the light and tcs is most definitely not on. pulled the throttle body again and cleaned it again, cleaned the contacts and checked wiring all ok.

  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...