Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If your idle is 1000 rpm with the tps disconnected then you need to adjust the idle down to 750 before checking the timing again as it may be slightly different.

As for sounding like a wrx, generally if it sounds like that then a cylinder isn't firing, from either lack of fuel or spark. Did you disconnect anything to do with fuel or ignition when you did the timing belt?

I checked it with a timing light the usual way man

I just forgot to buy a spark plug lead when I was at sprints buying the new plugs

And yeah mad082 your right, ill have to check the fsm to find out exactly the rpm I need

Misfire ended up being coilpack wiring so it idles so nicely now

yeah just checked the fsm it says 650

but your right thats very low

so it says 650 and 15 degrees +/- 2

so ill aim for 750 and 15 ish

if i get that right does that mean its set up properly now and should be fine to drive?

thanks for your help guys especially cal, helped with heaps lately

car might make matsuri now haha

What do u mean , you just said 650 ?

Ive set it at about 750- 800 now, idle is about 18 ish degrees advanced

Ecu is still pulling the timing back when it's under load

Going to check for codes tomorrow, won't be surprised if I see knock sensor code

Ecu is still pulling the timing back when it's under load

Going to check for codes tomorrow, won't be surprised if I see knock sensor code

What do you mean "under load"? The engine isn't really "under load" at idle.

You don't get a "knock" code if you have knock, you get a "knock" code if there is a problem with the knock sensors or circuitry.

  • Like 1

so i think being an old 89 gtst my ecu only has one diagnostic mode

self diagnostics? or real time...

which is giving me the all clear, code 55,

but going up the road, its still running majorly retarded and the exhaust temp light is flashing and so is the ecu light

its just flashing randomly, not any particular code or number or sequence..

does this mean the old ecus are real time or self diagnostic?

like, do i have to drive it to pick up ecu fault codes, or does it log the last 50 starts or whatever it is and remembers if it picked up a code or not

because its giving me no codes,... but still running with no power

cant find much info on it, there is only info on how to use the diagnostics, not whether its real time or self.

or whether there is different modes or not

just read this like straight after

http://performanceforums.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-67188185.html

single led ecus record last 50 starts and will flash error codes from the last 50 starts

so ive got no ecu codes

yet my ecu is still retarding the timing,

also i forgot to mention, i relocated the fuse box and moved the battery to the boot at the same time as this work. probably important, but nothing on the fuse box was cut

i might try resetting the ecu and see what that does because the leds shouldnt be flashing as im driving.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...