Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So whilst pulling down my rb26 I noticed a rather large amount of bearing material in the sump.

Oil pump was fine, not caused by surge. Conrod bearings were fine but mains had been worn away to the point where they were just a shell.

interesting thing is that the motor is about 1000km old.

the main bearing had the oil groove on the bottom half(where all the force is exerted. Unless there is some sort of rb26 majic trick that allows this to lubricate sufficiently, id say the engine builder f****ed up. Or is this normal??

Tomei restrictor/head drain enlarged also.

Any thoughts? Next step is crank regrind and new bearings.

the car should be 400awkw with hks2540. Hks264s and forged. Im thinking 1.5-2thou bearing clearance with the n1 pump should do nicely?

Cheers

Blake

post-117959-0-70255000-1398509801_thumb.jpg

post-117959-0-33301400-1398509820_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/442335-rb26-main-bearings-destroyed/
Share on other sites

Are all the main bearings like that?

Id be asking why, have you checked if the crank was straight on the last build?

What were the clearances like on the old build?

What weight oil were you running on those clearances?

Im not a fan of regrinding cranks, you start removing the hardened outer coating, not something i like on power builds.

Every single main was the same. Rod bearings were fine, no idea on the clearances, it was running royal purple possibly 10w-60 thats from memory.

Ill get the crank checked out, all I have to go on is receipts from the last build as I bought the car with bearings rattling.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...